Originally Posted by
UNM1136
Yes, there is a risk of,a head injury, but really, what are the options??? One of the biggest decision making issues is how do we resolve this situation with the fewest casualties? The officer that takes the decision to use that level of force has to be able to explain (justify) it. Taser training has changed over the last few years to accommodate those issues. Tasers have fewer residual issues than OC, or baton strikes, but they still require justification.
So yes, the tasing officer owns the decision, and its potential outcomes....
I have been tased a few times, and would rather be tased than OC'd any day of the week.
There are a lot of rules concerning Tasers and their applications to suspects (raised platform, running on a hard surface, under water applications,etc), but when the Taser is the right tool for the job, nothing else quite works so well. I have had taser failures, but they are the exception rather than the rule.
If someone is acting in a manner that a resonable officer would feel the need to dump them, whether with a taser or not, they would likely need to be dumped. You can dump someone with a taser, OC, a baton, or an armbar...each option has potential residual effects, but there you are.
Take a decision, or don't...you will have to answer for your decisions one way or another. Do or do not. There is no try.
In my experience the Taser is the far lesser use of force than elbows, knees, OC, or baton strokes.
pat