LOL!! I snoozed *one* today. That doesn’t mean there is only one. Or that I haven’t snoozed more of them.Originally Posted by blues
LOL!! I snoozed *one* today. That doesn’t mean there is only one. Or that I haven’t snoozed more of them.
Hell, he’s outright tiesexual.
”But in the end all of these ideas just manufacture new criminals when the problem isn't a lack of criminals.” -JRB
Which I assume is distinct from “Thaisexual”, or even “Thaicurious”?
Sorry… I think I’m channeling @blues tonight.
#RESIST
I had to look up "sartorial" because of this thread.
As a dude who is in his early 30's that has only ever worn uniforms in his professional life, is there some sort of manual to menswear that I can read?
I just hope this kid is able to have a life after this.
My grandfather always wore a bow tie. My son likes them too, when he's feeling snazzy.
For school photos one year, he wore a wool jacket my mother made for my grandfather, when she was in her late teens and a seamstress apprentice. The bow tie was recently made from a leftover scrap of the same fabric from the jacket. I can tell you, tying a wool bow tie is a total whore of a job, especially since i'm NOT an expert at the craft in the slightest.
Mom had trouble carrying babies to term, so I only wound up with one sibling. Sadly, she moved inside the beltway and went full left-tard. I predict Thanksgiving at mom's could be the last for all of us together. I'm the only family member hold out in the conservative camp.
Not watching in real time. Just go the part before the lunch break where the prosecutor spends 20 minutes trying to argue FMJ is so deadly it’s designed to got through multiple people.
And the judge cuts him off and says “hollow points can go through people too”
The prosecutor retorts, “your honor there’s no testimony to that effect”
Judge: “so what, you’ve been testifying yourself this whole time”
What fucking clown shoes circus this trial is.
For the lawyers here: suppose one of us was in Kyle’s position and the prosecutor started asking for details about ammo selection. How should we answer? My assumption is the lawyers here are better versed on law and guns than whatever lawyer we might hire.
On one hand, if we spend an hour explaining the details of our ballistic knowledge, we might look like a lunatic. But we might also look like a well-prepared, well-researched person. And would the judge even allow it? Wouldn’t we as the defendant need to establish ourself as an expert witness to enter that kind of testimony? Or because the prosecutor brought it up then it opens the door to be allowed?
Because I’d bet most of here know the reason hollow points aren’t used in the military is because of the Geneva convention. And that FMJ 5.56 will fracture at the cannelure and remain in the persons body.
I’d be concerned that the prosecutor would argue to the jury that we live, breathe and dream guns and that’s why we spend so much time studying them, and we’ve been waiting our whole lives to satiate our bloodlust.
Although if the prosecutor said that to me, I’d ask how I managed to hold off going on a killing spree for so long, having owned an AR15 for over 20 years.
Last edited by Sanch; 11-11-2021 at 02:13 AM.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say with the underlined statement, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. The fact that the guy, Joseph Rosenbaum, threw what turned out to be a plastic bag had little to do with anything because at that time he was already chasing Rittenhouse with violent intentions. Rittenhouse shot a hyper violent criminal who is chasing him and trying to grab his gun and who had previously threatened him and other people that if he caught them alone he was going to kill them, while rushing forward and screaming , "Shoot me, n!gga!" This individual, Joseph Rosenbaum, had spent over a decade in prison for sexually molesting and sodomizing several young boys. While in prison he assaulted guards on no less than 10 occasions. Earlier in the evening Rosenbaum was committing arson.
What's that have to do with the shooting? None of this was known to Rittenhouse at the time the time he shot Rosenbaum. Rittenhouse testified to his fear of being disarmed.
"Gunfighting is a thinking man's game. So we might want to bring thinking back into it."-MDFA
Beware of my temper, and the dog that I've found...
