Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: 1911s build quality and grip discussion

  1. #1

    1911s build quality and grip discussion

    I can't stand the "poor grip" excuse. If the weapon doesn't fire reliably except with good,strong two handed grip, what are you going to do with single handed fire? Continue to blame the shooter?
    #RESIST

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by LittleLebowski View Post
    I can't stand the "poor grip" excuse. If the weapon doesn't fire reliably except with good,strong two handed grip, what are you going to do with single handed fire? Continue to blame the shooter?
    +1
    I have tried and tried and tried to produce a stoppage in my G21 by limp wristing to the point that the gun flies out of my hand almost...it has yet to happen. And if I ever come across a gun that won't work because I didn't squeeze it hard enouth, it is going bye bye.

  3. #3
    Member JHC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Georgia
    10 1911's since '81, mostly rack grade; just a TRP and one custom as outliers. Numerous rookie shooters took their turns shooting them, never a stoppage for them. They've all been very reliable except for a briefly owned Gold Cup but I never found them to be sensitive to gripping just so.
    “Remember, being healthy is basically just dying as slowly as possible,” Ricky Gervais

  4. #4
    New Member BLR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Left seat in a Super Viking
    Quote Originally Posted by 10mm4me View Post
    +1
    I have tried and tried and tried to produce a stoppage in my G21 by limp wristing to the point that the gun flies out of my hand almost...it has yet to happen. And if I ever come across a gun that won't work because I didn't squeeze it hard enouth, it is going bye bye.
    Colt Defender is a subcompact "1911"

    G21 is a full size 45.


    You dont see the difference? I thought I was unambiguous on that. The smaller the mass (which means the smaller the pistol), the higher the spring rate. Which means the more critical it is to have as tight a grip as possible.

  5. #5
    Site Supporter Tamara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    In free-range, non-GMO, organic, fair trade Broad Ripple, IN
    Quote Originally Posted by blr View Post
    It's not really an excuse. It's physics. And it is a feature of all recoil operated firearms, not just pistols. Also, the second hand in a two hand grip does more for stability than "tightness" of the grip.
    A defensive firearm that requires a two-hand grip to function is worse than useless. Period.

    There's a reason it's called a "Handgun" and not a "Handsgun".

    I am not at all enamoured of 1911s shorter than 5" and just plain wouldn't trust anything smaller than a Commander, and that's years of sad, bitter experience talking. You couldn't give me a Colt Offender.
    Books. Bikes. Boomsticks.

    I can explain it to you. I can’t understand it for you.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by blr View Post
    It's not really an excuse. It's physics. And it is a feature of all recoil operated firearms, not just pistols. Also, the second hand in a two hand grip does more for stability than "tightness" of the grip.

    jmjames - you are correct to a point. You will find, however, when CZ production is attempted in the US, price goes up a bit. I'm not sure comparing eastern bloc countries to US manufacturing is quite right. And there are many, many, many more small block chevys being built than 1911s. Volume of production plays a role too. But this is academic too. So what if it is more expensive?

    Yes, 1911s are sometimes expensive. And if you dont change the oil in your car, than a Glock might be a better choice for you. But so what?
    Please don't try and turn this into a Glock versus 1911 battle. As in do not do so.

    Are you saying that 1911s are universally more sensitive to less than perfect two handed grips, therefore negatively effecting the reliability of the weapon or just all handguns? I certainly do understand that some sort of a grip is necessary for reliable functioning.


    Personally, I won't own a weapon that cannot run reliably in a less than perfect two handed grip or one handed. I have practical examples from my own life for believing this way.

    #RESIST

  7. #7
    New Member BLR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Left seat in a Super Viking
    I guess I am at a loss to the confusion over this. It is simple physics: The less mass and more spring you have on a pistol (compact/subcompact), regardless of make, the more "mass" you need to have behind your grip. That means, simplistically, a better grip.

    And how did my CQB thread get turned into this?

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by blr View Post
    I guess I am at a loss to the confusion over this. It is simple physics: The less mass and more spring you have on a pistol (compact/subcompact), regardless of make, the more "mass" you need to have behind your grip. That means, simplistically, a better grip.

    And how did my CQB thread get turned into this?
    "Poor grip" was mentioned as a reason that 1911s malfunction by you. I don't think anyone is arguing with your pint about springs and smaller pistols. I am certainly aware that my Series I Kimber Pro Carry is less reliable than a well built 5" 1911 could be.
    #RESIST

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Falls Church

    1911

    while we are talking about 1911's and Deltas I found this today, not mine and don't know the person.
    http://www.vaguntrader.com/forums/ub...ESS_STE#UNREAD
    I will accept any finders fees you would like to send.

  10. #10

    1911s build quality and grip discussion

    This is a placeholder for me to move over some off topic posts from another thread.
    #RESIST

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •