The big surprises to me in that BATF listing were Smith and SIG's .380 numbers. I knew Smith was selling a buttload of Bodyguards, but I didn't think it'd be that big of a buttload, and I would have expected LCPs to be outpacing SIGs 380 lineup by a bigger margin than the ~3:1 ratio that they are according to those numbers.
If I were George Kellgren, I'd be a sad panda. He's getting crushed by near-clones of his gun in a market niche he more or less invented. Even the TCP is way outselling the P3AT.
ETA: Take Ruger, S&W, and Taurus, and throw in Kel-Tec as a consolation prize, and you're looking at about a third of a million .380s in 2011. Kahr, which debuted its P380 that year, made less than 5,500 of them... So, this >$400 Glock is going to be the best-selling .380 on the market? Maybe among p-f.com members, okay.
Last edited by Tamara; 12-26-2013 at 04:08 PM.
Maybe if he'd stop trying to make silly shotguns and bullpup .308s that no one wants and focus on making the guns people actually want...no, nevermind. That's crazy talk.
On the other hand, looking at those numbers you can see why Beretta and Glock jumped on the .380 bandwagon. Conventional wisdom says that if it's raining soup, you'd be a fool not to stick a bowl out the window. (See: "Smith & Wesson Governor".)
Yet again, Tam comes out of her corner swinging a surprise upset on the internets.
All food for thought. Regarding the 3AT and Pandas: back in what was practically a past life, I had a chance to hear sales guy/personality/author Brian Tracy speak a bunch of times. One of his more memorable quotes was "you only have to be 1-2 percent new on an idea to make a fortune." As baby Jesus is my witness, is that *ever* true of Elsie.