Yep, the trigger mechanism housing is sometimes the unidentified culprit in sub-par Glock triggers. One of my two gen 4 G19s had a rougher trigger than the other. After much diagnosis I narrowed it down to the slot in the trigger mechanism housing that the connector flexes back into -- it was just *slightly* too tight. A few passes with a file, removing an imperceptible amount of polymer, smoothed it out nicely.
Another approach is to have some Glock parts in duplicate or triplicate and switch them around until you get the trigger feel you like.
Lately, I am convinced that for competition, I shoot a Gen 4 34 better than a G5. Not sure whether it is the finger grooves or something about the different trigger, but the timer consistently favors G4 by a small but measurable amount.
Likes pretty much everything in every caliber.
I’ve been running nothing but a G17.5 and G17.4 for the past six months. The G5’s grip and trigger “feel” better but I’m noticing the same thing you are. The G4 that (for me) “feels” tougher to shoot well is actually giving me better times and scores. Can’t explain it. I was prepared to not like it as much as the G5 but I can’t ignore what the timer and targets are telling me. Both have Dot connectors and the only changes I’ve made are better sights.
Are the sights the same basic design on the Gen 4 and Gen 5? Meaning are they both using fiber optic or night sights and are the front post and rear notch comparable.
Wasn't there a change in sight heights between the two generations? Have the makers (including Glock) sorted this out completely?