Want.
The spacing on the tension screws is what told me it wasn't a blade-tech, but obviously that was about as far as I got.
Who else spends time guessing at random pieces of black plastic on the internet? These days so much of the kydex out there looks so much alike...and still I waste brain cells. EL probably has a bazillion rigs....:-)
I feel pretty stupid jumping in on the "guess what holster" contest, especially since it's been answered by the owner already, but it looks like there are plastic caps on those screw heads (Comp-Tac doesn't currently do that, though they certainly may have in the past), and I'd have thought Comp-Tac would have had three tension screws for a gun with a barrel as long as the Beretta 92.
The 92LT and PX4CC peak my interests. I like the direction Beretta is going in. I WANT a gun that I can just shoot out of the box without having to tinker with (including sights).
I can shoot the Vertec fine, I just find that I shoot the standard frame better. Most of the guys that I know that have tried both and run them both hard end up going back to the standard 92 frame. It is really the difference in the way the gun contacts the heal of the strong hand and the leverage I can put on the gun.
Nothing wrong with the Vertec frame if that is what you like. The M9A3 is a hell of a package!
www.langdontactical.com
Bellator,Doctus,Armatus
Ernest, will your new pistol use a holster designed for a M9A1, M9A3, or does it require a new design?
Thanks
What is the advantage of combining a Vertec slide with a M9A1 frame over the 92A1 which already has the rail and the dovetail sights?
A lot of not-so-tactical people (myself included) would love to see a non-rail frame with a Vertec type slide. It seems like between the 92A1, Vertec, 90-Two, Brig, etc, every other combination has been represented but that.