I'm not sure about the "safe-ish" part. I'm probably forgetting something from earlier form this thread. Squirrel!
When I was starting out in the firearms world, it was understood that a gun in a case or a gun rug or a holster was "safe." That's not to say that you should treat them casually, but that if the trigger guard was effectively covered and someone couldn't simply shoot the gun with one motion, then it was not the same as simply handling a gun. I try to control the muzzle as much as possible, even when guns are in rugs or cases, but as I said in one of my earlier posts about weapons handling, I TRY to be as a safe as possible, and follow the four rules as closely as possible. Being human, in human situations, means that will never happen perfectly. I don't think carrying a gun on you is the safest thing you can do with a gun, it has some inherent risk. AIWB, for me, does not pose greater risk than many other positions. Any kind of shoulder holster is much worse, and even hip holsters can be bad under specific situations. Just like AIWB.
I'm not sure where all the controversy comes from, but like I said, I may be forgetting something or mixing threads at this point too.
Last edited by SLG; 05-27-2016 at 07:46 AM. Reason: spelling
The takeup distance is exactly the same, the difference is that the takeup weight is increased and thus you "feel" it longer. This IMO is an excellent thing for the reasons posted above by Chuck Haggard and Tamara.
Everyone has his tastes: SA and go safety on/off ad eternum, safe action and just only kind of trigger pull, SA/DA with the advantages mentioned in this thread, etc. But for the striker actions the goldilocks version for me is one where the striker is not fully precocked, has a rather heavy take up that is not short, and then a clean break that is not too heavy.
I remember well the studies mentioned by Tamara (one by an US agency, other european), I'll post them if I can find them.
Last edited by TiroFijo; 05-27-2016 at 07:29 AM.
I have no recollection of the coil springs being changed by Glock. Our first G17s my work bought in the late '80s had the original "NY" spring without the coil in the center and eight pound connectors. Glock sent us five pound connectors a year or two later to switch out the heavier ones due to the eight pound (+-marked) connector and NY spring causing issues when installed in the same gun. I forget what the specific problem was but the trigger pulls were quite heavy.
We traded all the G17s in 1998 for new G3 G22s gun for gun. Those had five pound connectors and the newer "NY-1" olive colored spring.
In 2005, all the G22s and G27s were traded for G23s. These had eight pound connectors and the coil trigger spring. Two smaller batches of G3 G23s were bought less than five years ago and those had five pound connectors and coil springs. Our recent batch of Gen 4 G23 has the NY-1 installed and am not familiar with the new connector poundage since I have not been to an armorer's school in a very long time. I will not work on the Gen 4s until I get sent back to Glock Armorer's School.
I have personally replaced three coil trigger springs in 27 years and have had not had to replace a NY spring due to breakage.
Yeah, if the choice is between a NY1 trigger on a glock and a DA/SA I'd go with my DA/SA Beretta every day and twice on Sundays....I can still talk about how my trigger finger is the safety, have a more shootable gun (for me), use 18 round mags, and IMO have a gun that tracks more predictably than a Glock.
But all this is splitting hairs I think.
Buy gun, buy gear, buy ammo, buy training classes. Buy more ammo and classes than you do guns and gear and you're probably gonna be fine.
Sent from my VS876 using Tapatalk