LAV bans AIWB for his courses

[45dotACP]

I have an idea. Would like to send a letter to Mr. Vickers and request stuff. Want to help me put together a list?


Dear Mr. Vickers:

Thank you very much for getting the Gadget into production. I understand you have incredible influence in the industry. Now that you got the Gadget going, can you help with the following:

1) a thumb safety model for the 320

2) Trijicon HD sights for the Beretta Brig Tac/Elite/SD

3) Trijicon HD sights for the CZ 75

4) Dawson and Heinie sights for the P2000

5) a Safariland 7TS ALS holster for the USP .45 and Sig 320

6) some heavy duty 10mm ammo that functions in a Glock 20 and 29

7) a shot timer that works for more than a month or two

8) a pistol specific red dot from Aimpoint

9) Trijicon HD sights for the Glock dehorned like Heinie and 10-8 rear sights

10) a HK trigger that shoots like a Sig, CZ or Beretta

Thank you in advance!

Not LAV, but extrapolating his responses here:

1. Too busy getting a Gadget into production for the 320...

2. No real operator operates with Berettas.

3. That's a gamer gun.

4. Those are gamer sights. HK is perfect

5. Only if he can give Bill Rogers a warning point.

6. 10mm is too expensive for an agency of operators to operate with.

7. There are no timers in the sandbox.

8. Pistols are for fighting your way to a Daniel Defense or BCM rifle..where your aimpoint should be mounted.

9. With diabetic neuropathy, who can feel the difference?

10. The HK is for operators...not gamers who shoot CZs, feds who shoot Sig, and navy SEALS, who get beheaded by their Berettas after the locking blocks break.

[GJM]

Good job. (You have a promising future on PF's sister forum, Doodie.)

[JAD]

. I would call my invention a Midget.

For some, as they've written about the Gadget, that would be an answer in search of a problem.

[runcible]

When it is written now and then that nobody (perhaps to the exclusion of LEOs) ought to be holstering at speed or with haste, does that include reholstering after an attempted take-away?

This ties in with AIWB more specifically as it's not a far logic jump for role players and combative subjects to attempt trigger access when a weapon is partially retained but partially extracted. The facial expressions demonstrated during FoF training when you press-trigger on an AIWB rig vice HIWB rig are interesting.

This also ties into the Gadget discussion, especially if using the elbow pin (preferred) vs hand-over to impede enemy access.

[BaiHu]

By the time my comments get posted Tom and Todd will be releasing the Gadget for the PPQ.

[Chance]

Larry just pulled a Kanye.

[HCM]

Larry just pulled a Kanye.

Chance wins the internet for today !

[TGS]

Taking the high road on that one must be hard, Tom and Todd.

Of course, there's good reason to. If you get in a pissing match with a skunk, you'll just come out smelling badly too. And that's what Mr. Vickers is....a skunk. There's going to be some satisfaction in this by making money off the product while LAV doesn't, as he continues acting like a nincompoop with his comments...which is probably going to chap his ass.

After reading his egotistical, self-centered messiah complex comment, I pretty much just lost all respect for him not as a shooting instructor, but as a man.

[johncorey]

I may be uniformed on this, but just how are his fanbois coming to the conclusion that LAV had something to do with the development of the Gadget? Did that ever come directly from LAV? Or can they just not comprehend written English when he says he generated much discussion in regards to AIWB?

Also, sadly LAV deleted TLGs comment on Facebook.....Petty. Tom Petty.

[JHC]

Chance wins the internet for today !

Another vote for Chance. Lol