OK, David. Move those goalposts as much as you'd like.
I am hard pressed to believe that you really need me to define the material damage of receiving a "less effective wire" than the one you paid for.
I don't have any interest in going round and round when you won't own your arguments. You keep drawing a false equivalence between carrying against policy vs acts of outright financial fraud (first stealing from retirement accounts, then bait-and-switch on building materials). Now you're saying it's irrelevant that your equivalence doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
I'll save any further keystrokes.