"You win 100% of the fights you avoid. If you're not there when it happens, you don't lose." - William Aprill
"I've owned a guitar for 31 years and that sure hasn't made me a musician, let alone an expert. It's made me a guy who owns a guitar."- BBI
That's basically Reaganomics (aka "voodoo economics"). To spur the economy out of 70's stagflation, Reagan's Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 lowered the top marginal tax bracket from 70% to 50%, the lowest bracket from 14% to 11%, and slashed estate taxes all while raising spending (particularly defense).
The ultimate goal of deficit spending, whether liberal MMT or conservative Reaganomics, isn't to spend unlimited money. It is to spend just enough to put everyone/everything to work. Once there are no more unemployed workers and idle machines, spending is supposed to normalize. MMT & Reaganomics really only differ on who gets first crack at the money (i.e. whether wealthy people keep more of their money or whether it is redistributed to the lower incomes).
The key is "responsible" deficit spending relies on the US dollar being a preferred currency around the globe. If a third world country wants a loan, banks generally don't want to be paid back in the local fiat currency which can be highly unstable - they want to be paid in US dollars. If US fiscal policies undermine that global faith in the US dollar, the house of cards comes crashing down.
Last edited by 0ddl0t; 05-20-2024 at 12:29 AM.