Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 59

Thread: SIG MCX-Regulator Ranch Rifle

  1. #1
    Site Supporter HeavyDuty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Not very bright but does lack ambition

    SIG MCX-Regulator Ranch Rifle

    Just saw this:

    https://www.sigsauer.com/mcx-r-regulator.html?utm

    SIG’s climbing on the less scary looking ranch rifle train.
    Ken

    BBI: ...”you better not forget the safe word because shit's about to get weird”...
    revchuck38: ...”mo' ammo is mo' betta' unless you're swimming or on fire.”

  2. #2
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    Alabama
    I had forgotten about this...finally explains it:

    https://pistol-forum.com/showthread....e-(Or-Shotgun)

  3. #3
    Site Supporter Rex G's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    SE Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by HeavyDuty View Post
    Just saw this:

    https://www.sigsauer.com/mcx-r-regulator.html?utm

    SIG’s climbing on the less scary looking ranch rifle train.
    I think that I like this, unless it is cost-prohibitive. I would, likely, get that stock off of it, on Day One, and install something better, assuming that it is an unaltered SGA stock, such that the receiver will mate-up to other 870-pattern stocks. Yes, I have tried a Mag Pul SGA, on an 870. No, thanks, at least on an 870. An effective cheek weld, if in any hurry, was impossible.
    Retar’d LE. Kinesthetic dufus.

    Don’t tread on volcanos!

  4. #4
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    USA
    I think they should have designed the receiver so that the comb of the stock would be parallel with the bore, as on an AR.

  5. #5
    This needs to be in a 6MM of some sort to be actually useful for those of us out West.
    Bert Gummer is my spirit animal

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    N. Alabama
    Quote Originally Posted by Le Français View Post
    I think they should have designed the receiver so that the comb of the stock would be parallel with the bore, as on an AR.
    Could be done, but not with any off-the shelf stock currently available. You'd need something that drops the grip down and then raises the comb up. Might end up looking like a ballistic-visor compatible stock.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by LittleLebowski View Post
    This needs to be in a 6MM of some sort to be actually useful for those of us out West.
    The 6mm MAX might be a good option.

  8. #8
    Eight pounds strikes me as heavy for this. My Browning .308 DBM is lighter.

    https://www.browning.com/products/fi...-magazine.html
    Likes pretty much everything in every caliber.

  9. #9
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    TEXAS !
    Quote Originally Posted by Rex G View Post
    I think that I like this, unless it is cost-prohibitive. I would, likely, get that stock off of it, on Day One, and install something better, assuming that it is an unaltered SGA stock, such that the receiver will mate-up to other 870-pattern stocks. Yes, I have tried a Mag Pul SGA, on an 870. No, thanks, at least on an 870. An effective cheek weld, if in any hurry, was impossible.
    That’s the exact opposite of my experience and that of many others with the Magpul SGA on the 870 and the Beretta 1301. I find it superior to a conventional stock.

    In this case, magpul offers SGA cheek risers in .25” increments so you can set the cheek weld where you want it.

  10. #10
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    TEXAS !
    Quote Originally Posted by GJM View Post
    Eight pounds strikes me as heavy for this. My Browning .308 DBM is lighter.

    https://www.browning.com/products/fi...-magazine.html
    The market for this is people in ban states not really as a BAR competitor or for people “out west.”

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •