@
1Rangemaster that’s the million dollar question.
But it’s probably a good idea to separate out what’s “best theoretical practice” versus what’s “necessary institutional lowest common denominator.”
There are in reality, probably (at least) three tiers of students.
1. Self motivated, self assessing.
2. Self motivated and not as adept at self assessing.
3. Not self motivated.
What works well for group 1 may be the gold standard but not realistic for group 2-3.
But similarly, group 3 curriculum might be inappropriate for group 1 students.
Despite a trainer’s best efforts, most paid high round count classes are probably populated with largely group 2 students with some group 1 and are likely more tailored to group 2 because of that.
Regarding hit factor scoring if I were to tailor it to self defense application for someone who was more type 2…
I would use:
Attachment 100918
And if using practiscore for calculating hit factor use major scoring as follows:
4” circle = 5 points
A zone = 4 points
C zone = 2 points
D zone = NPM (no penalty miss)
Miss = -10 points
That could cone down the shot spread if the student isn’t a type 1 that will keep training and know how to apply and scale the drills into application.