A nice look at the production of the M&P line:
A nice look at the production of the M&P line:
Good video, thanks for sharing.
The M&P 2.0 is a good product but I think I prefer the 1.0 with its more pronounced beavertail.
Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk
I'm actually the opposite.
While I don't own an M&P, I have shot both variations and the 1.0 with the beavertail lowers my hand in the grip. It's an individual thing, but the shallower and higher that area of the gun is, the more I can get the web of my hand high on the gun and be better able to control the gun.
" La rose est sans pourquoi, elle fleurit parce qu’elle fleurit ; Elle n’a souci d’elle-même, ne demande pas si on la voit. » Angelus Silesius
"There are problems in this universe for which there are no answers." Paul Muad'dib
I've wanted so desperately to standardize on the M&P lineup. I was an early adopter in 2008 after they were released and ended up with a gun that needed to go back to S&W three times to fix various issues. I developed a good working relationship with their customer service and stayed loyal to the company for a while. Unfortunately, I never could make the gun do anything that my Glocks didn't already do and I had to work harder just to make them a wash. Once the gen4 Glocks came out and I could add a beavertail to stop slide-bite, there wasn't much left to consider.
I still have a soft spot for the M&P though. A first generation gun bought cheaply and fitted with an Apex barrel and trigger would offer a lot of value.
" La rose est sans pourquoi, elle fleurit parce qu’elle fleurit ; Elle n’a souci d’elle-même, ne demande pas si on la voit. » Angelus Silesius
"There are problems in this universe for which there are no answers." Paul Muad'dib