Originally Posted by
joshrunkle35
One of my students was thinking about taking a job at a new local range in the area as a firearms instructor. He went in for an interview and chose not to take the job...I had known he was interested in the job for a while, and I asked him why he decided not to take it. He told me:
"It's one thing to have new shooters who are uneducated violate safety rules, they simply need someone to show them the importance of their actions. It's a totally different thing to have range owners who have been in law enforcement their whole lives place little to no value on safety. I have been taught how important safety is, and as I taught that to my students, it wouldn't be seen as a necessarily lesson, but instead as either 'something that just has to be said' or viewed as 'making waves'. I couldn't in good conscience work somewhere where 'professionals' don't take safety 'professionally'."
It's so absolutely sad that he is entirely right. I don't feel so bad when noobs don't know better. I feel awful when 'professionals' don't know any better. If you're a cop who has a negligent discharge on the job, you shouldn't have to go through remedial training; you should be banned from being a cop for life. There are millions of freaking EPA, noise ordnance, etc hoops to jump through to own a range. Why isn't there the slightest bit of safety training required? Oh, you read the NRA range safety officer book and mailed in a paper test? Wait, you took two more days of training and now you're a chief range safety officer? It's sad that many range owners don't even make it to that, the absolute bare minimum of training.