I fail to see the need for this... Its a lighter load than a 9mm, not mag fed, and only is more expensive to shoot. It looks nice, and gets points for ingenuity but fails in the "why" category.
Shades Steyr Hahn, Broomhandle Mauser.
That's what I was thinking. It's been some time since I looked at it, but the NY SAFE Act I don't believe specifies "external" or "removable" magazine in the part that refers to capacity. It just says "magazine". Which this still has: it's just internal and not removable.
There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men. - Robert Heinlein
Never change Keltec. If this were a rifle the fixed mag would help get around some AWBs but it still does nothing for capacity restrictions.
A stripper loading Sub2000 type thing in the future maybe?
This is hilariously awesome, leave it to KelTec to have the brass ones to go where others won’t.
“Pyramid Patchouli; there was only one joker in LA sensitive enough to wear that scent, and I had to find out who he was.” -Nick Danger, Third Eye, Firesign Theater
My wife has severe Rheumatoid Arthritis; she can not fire a double-action revolver, drop a magazine, rack a slide, handle recoil, or a small grip. She enjoys shooting(we do need to go again) and likes having a gun available to her when I'm away(not very often). She has a Glock 44 but I'd prefer a centerfire round. I've never fired a 5.7 so I've no idea of the recoil, but I think it may be too much in a lightweight $300.00 Keltec. Now if someone made a G19-sized pistol in .32 acp, maybe. She also doesn't want to spend much money on a new gun.
--Jason--