This is great thread,Last year I bought a LTT 92 compact from LTT and have loved shooting the gun. last year my Local shop had a Beretta full-size version of the LTT Full size, I bought that but the trigger pull and reset were not the same as the real LTT gun. I too ordered the TJIB for the full size. I went with the 13lb spring, I also ordered the Ameri Glo Spartan sights. When I am done the full size LTT and the Compact should basically be identical guns other than the size. My parts from LTT say they will arrive today!!
VZ Palm Swell Tactical Slants Gen2 grips ordered.
Now I just need to wait for everything to get here!
96s sucked. Parts breakage, not really designed for .40, etc. They're like a 5-8k round gun if you shoot them with duty-type loads. As an aside, when my department finally decided they needed an armorer and sent me to school, we had 12 year old 92Fs with well over 30k rounds through them with no spring changes or maintenance other than cleaning that ran like tops.
That's impressive-you had no trigger return spring breakages? Even with the newer OEM Beretta TRS, that's gotta be a land speed record for TRS longevity...I'm currently using the Wilson Bulletproof chrome silicon one which is supposedly a lifetime part, but I'll see. Previously I liked the Wolff TCU with its coil spring, but it didn't play well with either my Wilson/LTT triggerbar or LTT/VZ grips-I'll have to check my notes.
To date the Wilson TRS has been flawless.
Best, Jon
Sponsored by Check-Mate Industries and BH Spring Solutions
Certified Glock Armorer
*BARF* Why a 96? .40 is AWFUL in the 90 series and they have about half the durability of a 9mm.
I support a D model, but never .40, period.
Even in guns designed for .40, it's a terrible cartridge unless you're running it in a full size 10MM for training cost considerations.
Used to make pasta, now I make waffles.