I clicked the first link because I wanted to see the grip. It looks like the P365 Wilson grip, with a little bit of a Boresight Solutions Razorback hump.
--Jason--
The 365 is a more high-performance gun for sure. I shoot them well, and have recommended them to others. On the other hand, I'm not thrilled by the fully-cocked striker for AIWB. The 365 is really easy to shoot, and it feels right on the edge of too easy (especially in such a small package).
I'm a little concerned about the lighter, shorter trigger option in the X9. I sure hope it retains parts compatibility and doesn't have a fully-cocked striker.
“There is no growth in the comfort zone.”--Jocko Willink
"You can never have too many knives." --Joe Ambercrombie
The striker is essentially fully tensioned in the traditional Kahrs. It does travel a little more back when trigger is pulled, but it's about 10% of the full travel at release.
If you want a gun where the striker is not pre-tensioned, and the trigger pull draws the striker back for the full amount of its travel, consider a Taurus.
Ew.
😉
I should get one of these as a smaller option to complement my daily carry Wilson “X9”. That should lead to some confusing conversations.
Are you sure about that?
I measured the striker movement in my P9. This was with the gun disassembled, just looking at how the parts interact and measuring with calipers, so I may be off. From what I can tell the striker initially moves .4" when the slide is ran, then the trigger cocks the striker an additional .15". So I would say it is about 60-70% cocked, a little less than a stock glock. I also feel that the triggerpull requires more work to set off compared to a stock glock. And a stock glock requires more work to set off than most of the other striker fired pistols on the market.
Interested to hear more about Taurus if that is the case. I thought that the newer models are more or less fully cocked?