New revolvers at SHOT/Lipsey's release

[JCS]

Someone help an uneducated revolver guy understand the difference in the 432 and 632.

[cathellsk]

Someone help an uneducated revolver guy understand the difference in the 432 and 632.

432 black
632 stainless

[Noah]

Someone help an uneducated revolver guy understand the difference in the 432 and 632.

Black vs stainless

[lee n. field]

More in the “shits and giggles” niche, but it was also hinted that Heritage would soon have some centerfires on the menu. I would assume it’s the reintroduction of whatever Taurus used to call their SAA clones.
.

That was the "Gaucho". Not around for long.

[Noah]

More in the “shits and giggles” niche, but it was also hinted that Heritage would soon have some centerfires on the menu. I would assume it’s the reintroduction of whatever Taurus used to call their SAA clones.

But a .327 SAA sounds fun, and I don’t believe Ruger is making their single actions in any great numbers outside the Wrangler line.

Heritage imported a Pietta transfer bar gun as the "Heritage Big Bore" for some time, fits all parts for a Pietta Maverick and most Pietta 1873s.

[revolvergeek]

Another run of the Night Guards would be cool.

I missed a 315 NG a few years back in an estate. That one would have been a lot of fun. I wish they would do another run of 242s. If I had a spare I might actually carry and shoot mine.

[TeflonDon]

Someone help an uneducated revolver guy understand the difference in the 432 and 632.

Both frames are aluminum. One is colored black and the other a fake stainless. Both finishes aren't very durable.

[TeflonDon]

This Diamondback revolver is looking pretty interesting. Apparently it is J-frame sized, but 6 shots of .357. Uses j-frame grips and holsters. I doubt it will actually fit holsters... at least not good kydex ones... but the grip compatibility is a huge deal to me.

This superior to the 442 and 642 uc which is basically a dolled up standard 442 and 642. The only reason why this, what seem to be a superior offering, is being ignored is because Colt or S&W's Sama isn't attached to it.

[rathos]

It might be lightweight for a .357 but it is still heavier than a 442 or 642 by quite a bit. On top of that it has an exposed hammer so it doesn't work as well as a pocket gun. If it is anything like the kimber it ripped off it will be a decent gun, but more of a belt carry vs an ankle or pocket type of gun.

This superior to the 442 and 642 uc which is basically a dolled up standard 442 and 642. The only reason why this, what seem to be a superior offering, is being ignored is because Colt or S&W's Sama isn't attached to it.

[RevolverRob]

This superior to the 442 and 642 uc which is basically a dolled up standard 442 and 642. The only reason why this, what seem to be a superior offering, is being ignored is because Colt or S&W's Sama isn't attached to it.

Considering I have never seen anything Diamondback Arms has made last longer than 500 rounds - I would not be putting my money on this design.

The Kimber K6XS is likely a better choice if you don't want a Ruger, Colt, or Smith.