Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Ruger Super Wrangler Opinions

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    SATX

    Ruger Super Wrangler Opinions

    I have an interest in a .22 single action revolver and have not found much info here on the Ruger Super Wrangler. Due to the price of the Single Six these days...that's out unless I find a great deal on a used one. Is this cheaper Ruger a reduced price copy of the Single Six? Looks like it to me but I'm not very dialed in on these guns.

    On the surface, it certainly looks like a more economical way to get a decent quality SA .22.

    Opinions...?

  2. #2
    Member Crazy Dane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    In the far blue mountains
    Hopefully someone with more experience will be along shortly...

    I do not have one yet and in my limited research I found over on the Ruger forums where a guy changed out the frame to a Bisley grip and swapped in a hammer and trigger(?) off of a single-six. So parts are interchangeable but not all parts. These appear to be extremely accurate in .22 mag. My local gun shop cant keep them on the shelf.

  3. #3
    Mine is pretty accurate with Mini Mags. Some where on the forum is a pic of a 25 yard B8 with a decent group

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    SATX
    Quote Originally Posted by BobM View Post
    Mine is pretty accurate with Mini Mags. Some where on the forum is a pic of a 25 yard B8 with a decent group
    Would you say it's worth the money as a plinker? I don't expect amazing accuracy but you know it needs to be ok. Say at least 2"- 3" at 10 yds or so.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Redhat View Post
    Would you say it's worth the money as a plinker? I don't expect amazing accuracy but you know it needs to be ok. Say at least 2"- 3" at 10 yds or so.
    Name:  IMG_0149.jpeg
Views: 322
Size:  80.3 KB
    25 yards with Mini Mags

    Name:  IMG_0150.jpeg
Views: 322
Size:  48.2 KB

    Magnum cylinder, 40 grain CCI I think. Also at 25

    Name:  IMG_0151.jpeg
Views: 318
Size:  67.6 KB

    Post-sight adjustments. Mini mags at 25. The two holes above are from another gun.

    Heck of a shooter for the money.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    SATX
    Quote Originally Posted by BobM View Post
    Name:  IMG_0149.jpeg
Views: 322
Size:  80.3 KB
    25 yards with Mini Mags

    Name:  IMG_0150.jpeg
Views: 322
Size:  48.2 KB

    Magnum cylinder, 40 grain CCI I think. Also at 25

    Name:  IMG_0151.jpeg
Views: 318
Size:  67.6 KB

    Post-sight adjustments. Mini mags at 25. The two holes above are from another gun.

    Heck of a shooter for the money.
    I agree, of course a lot has to do with the shooter. 25 yd groups like that with irons are pretty much history for me.

    Do they have any type crown on those muzzles?

  7. #7
    Ready! Fire! Aim! awp_101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    DFW
    Quote Originally Posted by Redhat View Post
    I have an interest in a .22 single action revolver and have not found much info here on the Ruger Super Wrangler. Due to the price of the Single Six these days...that's out unless I find a great deal on a used one. Is this cheaper Ruger a reduced price copy of the Single Six?
    I handled, but did not shoot, one this afternoon just so I could try and enable help you out.

    Having had several Single Sixes over the years the Super Wrangler initially sort of felt like a "value rated" Single Six. It certainly lacks the heft of my 1968 Super Single Six but the more I handed it and thought about it, the idea of picking one up eventually is growing on me. IIRC the one I handled was $280+tax at a shop that is normally right at MSRP on everything and I really don't think even that price is out of line. It's certainly not out of line for a Ruger .22. I'm not sure you could even get a total basket case Single Six for that anymore.
    Nothing so needs reforming as other people's habits - Mark Twain

    Tact is the knack of making a point without making an enemy / Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    SATX
    Quote Originally Posted by awp_101 View Post
    I handled, but did not shoot, one this afternoon just so I could try and enable help you out.

    Having had several Single Sixes over the years the Super Wrangler initially sort of felt like a "value rated" Single Six. It certainly lacks the heft of my 1968 Super Single Six but the more I handed it and thought about it, the idea of picking one up eventually is growing on me. IIRC the one I handled was $280+tax at a shop that is normally right at MSRP on everything and I really don't think even that price is out of line. It's certainly not out of line for a Ruger .22. I'm not sure you could even get a total basket case Single Six for that anymore.
    I know I was totally shocked at the current MSRP for the Single-Six. Last time I looked at one I want to say they were a little under $300. I never had much interest back then because 45LC wasn't outrageously expensive. From what I'm hearing and reading, I don't think the more expensive Single-Six would do anything I need better than it's budget sibling.

    You probably should pick one up

  9. #9
    Site Supporter farscott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Dunedin, FL, USA
    The Super Wrangler is definitely a Single-Six variant that is less expensive due to less labor being used for cosmetics (much less polishing and a Cerakote finish). Things like grips are also different, but the revolver is essentially a Single-Six. The parts do interchange with parts from the six-shot New Model Single-Six. With the Cerakote finish, one could argue the finish is much more durable than the blued Single-Six and more subdued than the stainless Single-Six. Like all convertible .22LR/.22WMR revolvers, the bore has been drilled and rifled for the larger .22 WMR round. That means precision with the .22 LR is likely not going to be target-grade. Just like the Single-Six.

    I was lucky enough some time ago to get a very lightly used Single-Six for $350. If I could not have done that, I would have no issues purchasing a new Super Wrangler after owning two Wranglers.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    SATX
    Quote Originally Posted by farscott View Post
    The Super Wrangler is definitely a Single-Six variant that is less expensive due to less labor being used for cosmetics (much less polishing and a Cerakote finish). Things like grips are also different, but the revolver is essentially a Single-Six. The parts do interchange with parts from the six-shot New Model Single-Six. With the Cerakote finish, one could argue the finish is much more durable than the blued Single-Six and more subdued than the stainless Single-Six. Like all convertible .22LR/.22WMR revolvers, the bore has been drilled and rifled for the larger .22 WMR round. That means precision with the .22 LR is likely not going to be target-grade. Just like the Single-Six.

    I was lucky enough some time ago to get a very lightly used Single-Six for $350. If I could not have done that, I would have no issues purchasing a new Super Wrangler after owning two Wranglers.
    2 Wranglers...why'd you let them do? Were they duds?

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •