When I went through the HK Subgun instructor class the lead instructor let us shoot a suppressed MK23. Dang it was a heavy pistol but that thing could shoot. It was easy making long range hits on 8” plates.
Thread drifting. He didn’t have his issued truck. He was out of the Detroit area and had flown to Vegas and had a borrowed truck. He said he had an HK51 with a drum in his truck that’d he’d let us shoot if he had it. I still think about shooting that gun.
Just a dog chauffeur that used to hold the dumb end of the leash.
He didn't really sell his use case for that gun vis a vis the Roland Special iteration of the concealable Offensive Handgun, did he?
He stated that the RS was less reliable(due to the compensator) and then sought a more reliable pistol...that he didn't compensate.
Thus he ends up with an unnecessarily large optic equipped handgun in a questionably necessary caliber/load.
Other than HK/SEAL swank he could have gotten almost the same performance Delta from sticking an optic and a light on a Glock 19 or any number of smaller guns at 1/3 the price.
I think your point from your last post still stands. If the OHWS had been built by(literally) anyone else it would be an historical curiosity.
Administrator for PatRogers.org
If I were in market about cheapest I have seen lately $1800 on non-suppressor equipped model.
https://armsunlimited.com/heckler-ko...an-suppressor/
What does the Mk23 offer that a USP .45 Tactical doesn't, other than like one extra round and a huge amount of bulk and mass? I'm 6'4" with XXXL hands. The USP .45 is perfect. In the very beginning with guns, the Mk23 hype caught my attention. Then I went to a gun show and handled one. Maybe Shaq would like it. (I think I read somewhere that he actually carries one concealed.) I'm big, but I'm not big enough for that gun.
.
-----------------------------------------
DA dork.