With all due respect Bill Wilson is a Jeweler turned gunsmith, and a very astute competition shooter and businessman.
But he’s not someone with any significant experience dealing with actual violence or criminals.
The key to someone who can’t meet that standard due to age, physical limits, or carry method carrying is to know their limitations.
As a young man I worked with many retired NYPD officers who worked in the era when NYPD mandated the “Jay-Pee” duty holster. It prioritized retention over fast draw. As a result they emphasized awareness/ seeing trouble coming and the concept that if one did see trouble coming your gun belonged in your hand.
I love me some work on a timer but I put mental factors (awareness & judgment) and safe handling over BW’s abstract standard.
You've got a huge point about the gun handling and safety, once that slips it's hard to justify having a gun. Personally, when I do IDPA matches, I'm chasing perfect hits, zero non-shoots and perfect pieing around obstacles as well as absolute muzzle safety. Speed is way down the road as a consideration. A couple anecdotal elderly shooter stories: My former father-in-law wanted a revolver for simplicity sake (he had a pristine T-Series HiPower but didn't like shooting it) and we found him a sweet little Model 15 .38 and took it out on the range. He loaded up and dumped two cylinder full's within the 9 ring on a B27 at seven yards double action at a decent cadence. I asked when he'd last shot a handgun and he said, "Right after the Tet Offensive." He drove a rescue Huey in Vietnam and went on to be a regional director of aviation for the forest service.
The other was my Dad. Dad was in the Corps of Engineers for the effort to rebuild some of German infrastructure after the war; worked building a couple large dams in S. Dakota and then did 32 years in a steel mill driving over the road and then in a Hyster moving steel products. After he retired, he spent another 14 years driving dealer trades for a couple car dealerships. He loved getting out on the road! At some point conversations with Mom got alarming -things like, his having gotten lost returning home from shopping a couple miles away. I was in a position to retire from a job in Vegas and moved back to my home town to help out. We had the conversation about driving, which was one of the most soul wrenching things I've done -but he agreed. We still got out on the road for random road trips with me driving, which he enjoyed. The next thing to be addressed was guns. He'd always been a gun collector and bird hunter and there was always a handgun under the mattress or if summertime with just the screen door closed, in a pistol rug next to him in the lazy-boy. One night when I was repainting their place, I stayed overnight, sleeping in the finished basement. I woke up to seeing the flashlight beam moving back and forth as he was coming down the stairs. I said, "Hi Dad!" and turned on the light. He told me "They" said "there was a fire downstairs." I asked who "they" were and if there was a fire why he brought his Model 27.... The next day that gun had a much shorter firing pin. Within a week of that he'd taken a fall and eventually went into assisted care, where he passed almost a year to the day after arrival. His plot at the Black Hills National Cemetery in Sturgis overlooks I-90 and I like to think it was a great spot for him. Sorry for the long post!
-All views expressed are those of the author and do not reflect those of the author's employer-
I hate to break this to you, but the old west was not the old west in the way. Your statement implies.
Skeeter Skeleton (someone who had considerable acquaintance with real violence and real criminals) addressed this perfectly in an article titled “The Gunmen of El Paso.”
http://darkcanyon.net/gunmen_of_el_paso.htm
However, time has its place.The devotee of firearms may draw some valid conclusions from El Paso's bullet-spattered history. While the gunmen of that place were as good as the best of the time - all of them had survived many battles before arriving in the tough border town - nothing in their performances, with the possible exception of Dallas Stoudenmire, indicated that they were outstanding sixgun men. Their close-range encounters, often from ambush, suggested murder and assassination rather than an open contest of skill between men at arms. Examination of their widely diverse methods of carrying their pistols - Hardin's shoulder holsters sewed to his vest, Stoudenmire's pocket draw, the high-ride, pistol-in-the-front-of-the-belly style of Selman and Outlaw - all point to the fact that a fast draw was of small importance to these men. When disputes found them, their sixguns would already be clear of leather and, hopefully, pointed at an unwarlike portion of their opponent's anatomy.
Today's handgunners could skunk any of the oldtimers. Slick, accurate, double-action guns, scientifically designed belts and holsters, a plentitude of practice and ammunition - all these factors make the handgun man of the present easily the master of the best of the 19th-century gunfighters. But turn the Selmans, Hardins, Stoudenmires, and Outlaws loose in the same wild border town against any of today's civilized sixgun experts, and I submit that there would soon be no experts. the reason is one that many of today's antigun fanatics fail to grasp. A shooter and a killer are two different things.
It can give one more options. If your use case is mostly get out of trouble verse, go look for trouble you may not need those options, but if you need them, there’s no substitute.
Once MUC and posturing are over fights are basically a series of competing time cycles.
But gun in hand and unequal initiative is still > fast draw.
I don’t buy that this is a primarily an age thing.
In my experience the majority of what you describe is 99% “ never learned right” combined with being too invested in fudd lore to learn right now.
The older shooters with solid backgrounds and /or who have come to / returned to shooting later in life but were open to learning “right” do just fine even into their 70s.
The youngsters may leave them in the dust once moving is involved, but they’re shooting gun handling and safety are on point.
1000% agree.
At work I see people through end of life and the process.
Car keys get taken away (usually by family) when people don’t know limits and insist on pushing past them. The state standard is nebulous and passing doesn’t mean competence.
What I see with conscientious people is that they scale back their driving and scenarios as their skills wane.
No highway, no dusk, no inclement weather.
They know their limits and have risk mitigation levels to prevent hurting themselves and others.
I would expect the same from conscientious handgun practitioners but I know it doesn’t apply to all.
I know that, I should have added that is was the Old West of TV presentation. Besides, Paladin won the day with a derringer hidden behind his belt which he sneakily drew.I hate to break this to you, but the old west was not the old west in the way. Your statement implies.
Time counts, but Wilson seems to imply a more "Wild West" TV draw shoot out. Certainly his standard being used to tell someone not to carry doesn't make sense in today's world.
Cloud Yeller of the Boomer Age