Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789
Results 81 to 83 of 83

Thread: Shotguns in modern military combat

  1. #81
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Away, away, away, down.......
    Quote Originally Posted by TCinVA View Post
    Whatever munition is being used in that shotgun appears to offer absolutely zero recoil.

    So color me skeptical.
    He fires one round at first with recoil and the second shot with flames looks like an actual misfire with loose powder burning due to shitty ammo. Who knows if he hit anything.

    The interesting part of that thread to me is some of the guys who have used them in combat shared their experiences.

    A few of the guys said they‘re effective out to around 50 meters on Mavics.

    One said that when the Russians see a shotgun from the drone they’ll get get distance to avoid being shot down, but, that’s still better than nothing.

    Another said that Turkish box-mag fed shotguns malfunction if you leave the magazines loaded for too long due to crappy springs.

    One dude put an optic on his gun and thought it helped his marksmanship.

    There wasn’t any talk about use specifically against FPVs

    While limitations of the gauge were acknowledged most seemed to think something was better than nothing, and op would rather see mass issue by the state of a basic pump than more limited purchases of semi-autos or other more complicated guns.
    im strong, i can run faster than train

  2. #82
    Quote Originally Posted by TGS View Post
    What's the altitude of your clays?

    What's the typical operating altitude of a man-packable 4 rotor drone in a foreign combat situation where the 400ft FAA ceiling is not relevant?

    @Caballoflaco, this is why I'm surprised there's a usefulness for shotguns in anti-drone work. It's pretty easy to operate above the useful envelope of a shotgun.
    Garand thumb recently released a video with 2 guys who have been fighting in the Ukraine for 2 years. Drones were discussed, with multiple types/roles described.

    First Person View (FPV) drones were described as being very fast, rarely stationary, and having a high pitched noise. Their role is to simply fly into a target and detonate.

    Mavic drones were described as a lower whine, with longer loiter time. While they can often drop an explosive, they were described as operating much higher, and sometimes having thermal. It was talkrd about how they can work in teams with FPVs. Essentially bracketing in the FPVs.

    Large gas powered drones with very long loiter times at aircraft altitudes were also discussed.

    Shotguns were discussed as becoming a common anti-drone tactic. Primary defense from drones was getting into a bunker with fabric over doorways to prevent FPV drones from flying in. They said they're seeing Mossberg 500s with simple birdshot being issued specifically for drones. It wasn't clear what style of drone they were talking about engaging.

    Last edited by Cory; 02-19-2024 at 09:07 AM.

  3. #83
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Away, away, away, down.......
    Russian anti-drone troop ca:2024 man-portable EW and a Russian O/U

    https://twitter.com/@twitter/status/1764670324799414302
    im strong, i can run faster than train

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •