I make the TFB Youtube Big Time

[TeflonDon]

The TJE article is summary of the peer viewed article:

Meyer, G.E., Gerondale, T., Kiriazes, C., Baños, A., Lakin, C., & Rinker, A. (2009). Juries, gender and assault weapons. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 945-972.

It has all the details of the study. This is link to it.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/...rtdmC7kiGTEItc

So we have to buy access to see how the study was done?

[John Hearne]

So we have to buy access to see how the study was done?

Or visit any decent university library and download it for free there.

[Glenn E. Meyer]

So we have to buy access to see how the study was done?

Welcome to capitalism. Tell the WSJ to give me a free subscription. Sorry, that's the way it works.

[TeflonDon]

Welcome to capitalism. Tell the WSJ to give me a free subscription. Sorry, that's the way it works.

We simply asked the author of the study how it was done in the thread he created referencing the study lol. Nice shameless try though. I'll give you that.

[Glenn E. Meyer]

Look, I have better things to do then rewrite the entire article on p-f. It's available and I told you where. I get nothing in terms of money from the article. If I want some of the journal articles I want to read, I pay for them or use my faculty status - for which the university has paid the publisher - that is part of the benefits for my work for them and part of retirement benefits (which cost money).

When I learn from Mas - money changed hands for his course, I paid for his books. Luckily, TJE had a free summary - which they asked me do it.

The original article is 27 pages of intro, methods, results, appendices with protocols, stats, summaries and conclusions. If Ed wants the details or someone else does - great! But I'm not retyping 27 pages or violating the publication agreement.

[TeflonDon]

Look, I have better things to do then rewrite the entire article on p-f. It's available and I told you where. I get nothing in terms of money from the article. If I want some of the journal articles I want to read, I pay for them or use my faculty status - for which the university has paid the publisher - that is part of the benefits for my work for them and part of retirement benefits (which cost money).

When I learn from Mas - money changed hands for his course, I paid for his books. Luckily, TJE had a free summary - which they asked me do it.

No one asked you to recite the entire article. They asked simple direct questions.

[Glenn E. Meyer]

Ok, tough. Details without the entire context are not useful. Ed wanted significant details. I told p-f where to find them. Don't want to spend the money - tough.

[Joe in PNG]

Ok, tough. Details without the entire context are not useful. Ed wanted significant details. I told p-f where to find them. Don't want to spend the money - tough.

I believe there's a law somewhere that if someone on the internet demands more information, you are obligated to act as unpaid research assistant.

[TeflonDon]

I believe there's a law somewhere that if someone on the internet demands more information, you are obligated to act as unpaid research assistant.

No, but if someone starts a thread, starts a discussion, makes claims, and cites a study they did, they should be able to answer simple question. It appears the OP can not or at least refuses to.

My simular studies, research, and testing which also involved several mock trials contradict his results. There were several mock trails also involving different weapons from knives to types of firearms. My test took place over the course of a year. My research appears to be much more extensive.

[Joe in PNG]

No, but if someone starts a thread, starts a discussion, makes claims, and cites a study they did, they should be able to answer simple question. It appears the OP can not.

Why?