Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 34

Thread: Any LCR fans?

  1. #11
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Ft Leavenworth, KS
    Quote Originally Posted by TGS View Post
    ...you can get an LCR with XS sights, good grips and a decent trigger. Sure, not everyone's favorite sight...
    FWIW, Novak's has front sight options for the LCR now with a big tritium or fiber optic dot, that's in a conventional square sight, instead of the rounded XS profile.

    Of course, I noticed this in the Brownell's catalog about ten minutes after I'd finished installing an XS front sight on my LCR.

  2. #12
    Site Supporter Tamara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    In free-range, non-GMO, organic, fair trade Broad Ripple, IN
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave J View Post
    Of course, I noticed this in the Brownell's catalog about ten minutes after I'd finished installing an XS front sight on my LCR.
    Story of my life, right there.
    Books. Bikes. Boomsticks.

    I can explain it to you. I can’t understand it for you.

  3. #13
    I don't think the recoil is the same between a LCR and a J- frame scandium when shooting 38. I think the LCR has more felt recoil.

  4. #14
    Site Supporter Jay Cunningham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    I consider a CT laser mandatory on any snubbie.

  5. #15
    Site Supporter Tamara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    In free-range, non-GMO, organic, fair trade Broad Ripple, IN
    Quote Originally Posted by BrianB View Post
    I don't think the recoil is the same between a LCR and a J- frame scandium when shooting 38. I think the LCR has more felt recoil.
    If God wanted me to shoot revolvers lighter than a steel-cylindered Airweight, he'd have put more padding over the bone at the base of my thumb.
    Books. Bikes. Boomsticks.

    I can explain it to you. I can’t understand it for you.

  6. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Middle TN
    Quote Originally Posted by Tamara View Post
    If God wanted me to shoot revolvers lighter than a steel-cylindered Airweight, he'd have put more padding over the bone at the base of my thumb.
    Good one Tam. The S&W J Frame Airweight is the lightest 38 Special I'll play around with but I'm more comfortable with the weight of a Charter Arm's all steel Undercover. Of course the problem with that is the Charter Arms Undercover isn't a S&W M-36 or M-37...sigh...

  7. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Central Florida! Land of Mickey Mouse.
    My S&W 638 meets my needs and I have had it many years. No desire or need for a LCR .38/.357.

    On the other hand a LCR .22 is sparking some interest as well as a SR.22. Might give up my .22/45 for that pair.

  8. #18
    The out of the box trigger feels better on the LCR, but the sights track funny and there's a weird false reset on the trigger that locks the cylinder up if you pull the trigger from it. Similarly short stroking a smith only skips a chamber.

  9. #19
    13 ounces for a .38? WAY too heavy. Here is a .357 at 11 ounces. True with a HOT .357 round it feels like getting hit in the palm with a bat by Hank Arron.


  10. #20
    Site Supporter Tamara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    In free-range, non-GMO, organic, fair trade Broad Ripple, IN
    Quote Originally Posted by 1 old 0311 View Post
    13 ounces for a .38? WAY too heavy. Here is a .357 at 11 ounces.
    If you shoot that riboflavin-framed .357 enough to maintain anything remotely like proficiency with it, you'll be the first person I've met who owns one that does so.
    Books. Bikes. Boomsticks.

    I can explain it to you. I can’t understand it for you.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •