Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 99

Thread: SIG ROMEO X

  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by RJ View Post
    Why would they do that?
    To give a reference for level?(No idea) As far as mysteries go, the reticle design choice isn’t nearly as perplexing as making this open emitter.

  2. #22
    Chasing the Horizon RJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Central FL
    Well gah dang, I guess they are right. I grabbed a screen shot from an earlier Sig video of the M17, sure looks like it is open at the bottom, and I was wrong. Very curious.

    Name:  Screenshot from 2023-07-19 09-39-42.png
Views: 604
Size:  88.6 KB

    34 seconds in:


  3. #23
    The circle reticle SKD the Holosun 507 Comp also leave a gap at the bottom of the circle. There’s probably a reason for it. I just don’t know it.
    My posts only represent my personal opinion and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or official policies of any employer, past or present. Obvious spelling errors are likely the result of an iPhone keyboard.

  4. #24
    Site Supporter HeavyDuty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Not very bright but does lack ambition
    Holdover reference?
    Ken

    BBI: ...”you better not forget the safe word because shit's about to get weird”...
    revchuck38: ...”mo' ammo is mo' betta' unless you're swimming or on fire.”

  5. #25
    Chasing the Horizon RJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Central FL
    Quote Originally Posted by call_me_ski View Post
    To give a reference for level?(No idea) As far as mysteries go, the reticle design choice isn’t nearly as perplexing as making this open emitter.
    Quote Originally Posted by HeavyDuty View Post
    Holdover reference?
    Ja, something like that I guess. I fixed and uploaded the QRC for the RomeoX, and tweaked the reticle in the M17 one while I was at it this morning. Both are in the Google drive.

  6. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by Default.mp3 View Post
    https://www.sigsauer.com/romeo-x.html

    Based on the ROMEO M17. That being said, I don't actually see any information that it's an enclosed optic, which would be a huge miss, IMO.
    It is not enclosed. 2 future ones will be

  7. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by RJ View Post
    Oof. Open emitter, $400 price point...IPX7 rated... Well, I like the built-in rear sight notches. And they have a "Compact" version for P365's, which is cool.

    I bought an EPS Carry recently (street price well under $400), enclosed emitter, IPX8 rated...yeah I don't think I would swap it for a Romeo X.
    Agreed. At eps carry price why would someone buy a Romeo x

  8. #28
    Site Supporter HeavyDuty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Not very bright but does lack ambition
    Quote Originally Posted by G19Fan View Post
    It is not enclosed. 2 future ones will be
    Oh really? What have you heard?
    Ken

    BBI: ...”you better not forget the safe word because shit's about to get weird”...
    revchuck38: ...”mo' ammo is mo' betta' unless you're swimming or on fire.”

  9. #29
    Site Supporter HeavyDuty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Not very bright but does lack ambition
    Quote Originally Posted by G19Fan View Post
    Agreed. At eps carry price why would someone buy a Romeo x
    Not PRC.
    Ken

    BBI: ...”you better not forget the safe word because shit's about to get weird”...
    revchuck38: ...”mo' ammo is mo' betta' unless you're swimming or on fire.”

  10. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by HeavyDuty View Post
    Not PRC.
    Parts still made there though

    Just designed and assembled here.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •