SIG ROMEO X

[Noah]

I would need to pull an optic from one of my 92 RDOs. I’ll take a pic next time I do that.

BOLO for 2 small recoil posts at the front of the plate, in between the standard 507K posts at the outside of the footprint.

If LTT advertises their EPS/407K plate as one item, that's a clue, and if they list the EPS plate separate from a K plate, that's also a clue.

[HeavyDuty]

BOLO for 2 small recoil posts at the front of the plate, in between the standard 507K posts at the outside of the footprint.

If LTT advertises their EPS/407K plate as one item, that's a clue, and if they list the EPS plate separate from a K plate, that's also a clue.

LTT lists:

Our Holosun EPS Plate fits:

Holosun EPS
Holosun EPS Carry
Holosun 407k
Holosun 507k

So, the clue is that a Romeo-X Compact just might work?

[Noah]

LTT lists:



So, the clue is that a Romeo-X Compact just might work?

Yes!

[HeavyDuty]

@Noah:

[Noah]

@Noah:

Should fit! Looks like the plate is a 507K cut (2 wide spaced front posts) and optic is a full RMSC cut (4 corner posts). The EPS is 4 posts across the front.

[HeavyDuty]

The Romeo-X Compact is here, and it’s too tight to drop into the LTT plate recess - it’s very close, though. I would normally modify the plate, but I don’t know how I would do that with the concave surfaces. I think I’ll try my full size RDO 92 to see if it’s the same, and reach out to @LangdonTactical if that doesn’t work.

Just kidding.



It even used the LTT supplied fasteners, I just needed better light and different cuss words. I’ll let the crew over there know the existing EPS plate has another verified fit. I’ll be listing the 6MOA red EPS in the classifieds, and will likely replace the second shortly.

[John Hearne]

FWIW, I finally got my Romeo X mounted on my Macro. For the record, I have a P320 with a Romeo1 Pro and I've taken a MSP red dot class previously but never carried a dot or considered myself "good to go" with them.

I think the low deck height is a game changer. Making sure the dot comes up was dramatically easier. Even with strong and weak hand work, it just worked better. I hope to zero it and live fire it later this week.

[GJM]

It definitely has low deck height, but so do a number of the K Holosun optics. The X has a number of advantages over the Holosun options -- a better battery cap, shielded buttons to avoid inadvertent touches, a better rear sight, and brighter dot intensity.

[Noah]

FWIW, I finally got my Romeo X mounted on my Macro. For the record, I have a P320 with a Romeo1 Pro and I've taken a MSP red dot class previously but never carried a dot or considered myself "good to go" with them.

I think the low deck height is a game changer. Making sure the dot comes up was dramatically easier. Even with strong and weak hand work, it just worked better. I hope to zero it and live fire it later this week.

I had the same experience with an SCS on a G19 MOS. The deck on that is about flush with the slide.

[GJM]

I had the same experience with an SCS on a G19 MOS. The deck on that is about flush with the slide.

I wonder if a low deck height is more helpful for someone transitioning from iron sights to a dot, and is used to the height over the slide of iron sights? I find the size of the display a bigger factor in getting the dot support hand and in weird positions, with a larger display with minimal frame to be more forgiving.