https://www.sigsauer.com/romeo-x.html
Based on the ROMEO M17. That being said, I don't actually see any information that it's an enclosed optic, which would be a huge miss, IMO.
https://www.sigsauer.com/romeo-x.html
Based on the ROMEO M17. That being said, I don't actually see any information that it's an enclosed optic, which would be a huge miss, IMO.
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
They both have a usable rear, nice for the OG 365 XL and M17/18 slides.
Adam
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/si...17-technology/
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
Last edited by Tokarev; 07-18-2023 at 02:07 PM.
Oof. Open emitter, $400 price point...IPX7 rated... Well, I like the built-in rear sight notches. And they have a "Compact" version for P365's, which is cool.
I bought an EPS Carry recently (street price well under $400), enclosed emitter, IPX8 rated...yeah I don't think I would swap it for a Romeo X.
Didn't notice it was an open emitter until RJ mentioned it. Rats, I got hot and bothered as my XLs have the removable plate/rear sight.
Adam
I’m not seeing the open emitter unless it’s under the hood outside the glass?
https://cdn0.thetruthaboutguns.com/w...ro-compact.jpg
Ken
BBI: ...”you better not forget the safe word because shit's about to get weird”...
revchuck38: ...”mo' ammo is mo' betta' unless you're swimming or on fire.”
The TTAG article states they are open emitter designs.
My posts only represent my personal opinion and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or official policies of any employer, past or present. Obvious spelling errors are likely the result of an iPhone keyboard.
Ja, it was in the TTAG verbiage:Originally Posted by HeavyDuty
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote