As promised, I gathered up my current crop of handhelds over the weekend and headed to a vacant floor at work that has become my de facto indoor light testing area. I used the same fixed exposure settings to prevent my phone from making everything look the same and I did my best to approximate what I was seeing, but ultimately, I'm still working with an iPhone camera and I'm no photographer, so this isn't a perfect representation.
The lineup:
- Modlite HOG OKW - 700 lumens / 170,000 candela
- Modlite HOG PLHv2 - 1,350 lm / 120,000 cd
- Modlite 18650 OKW - 680 lm / 69,000 cd
- Modlite 18650 PLHv2 - 1,350 lm / 54,000 cd
- Modlite 18650 PLH5K - 1,500 lm / 29,000 cd
- Cloud Defensive MCH-HC-2.0 - 1,100 lm / 71,000 cd
- Cloud Defensive MCH-HC-DF - 1,100 lm / 80,000 cd
- Cloud Defensive MCH-Duty-HO-DF - 1,800 lm / 50,000 cd
First, we have a long hallway with the far wall being approximately 65 yards away.
Both HOGs have no problem reaching the end of the hallway and maintaining a very well-defined hotspot, with the PLH being slightly larger than the OKW. I'm convinced there's next to no discernible difference between the HOG OKW and PLHv2 inside of 50 yards.
The 18650 OKW and PLHv2 also stretch out to the end of the hallway, though with less intensity. The 18650 PLH5K just barely lights up the far wall and it's pretty obvious it's only got half the rated candela of the OKW.
Although rated some 15k cd higher than the 18650 PLHv2, to my eye the MCH-HC-2.0 has less throw than the PLHv2, and the MCH-HC-DF appears to have the same throw as the PLHv2 despite being rated 26k cd higher. I'd like to see some third-party testing for some honest numbers. The MCH-Duty candela rating seems more accurate as far as I can tell; it appears dimmer than the PLHv2 but provides notably more throw than the PLH5K.
Now, for a close-range comparison, here we're looking at 20 yards to the far wall.
Again the HOGs are very similar, with the PLH providing a tad more spill. What I like about these shots is the open doorway on the left hand side, which really makes it evident how much spill the lights have. The 18650 OKW is such a tight beam that I can't make out anything inside the doorway. The HOG OKW is still a tight beam, but with more than double the candela, there's enough light bouncing around to provide a little bit of illumination into that doorway. The PLH5K is a nice, diffuse beam relative to the others and provides a good amount of light through the doorway.
It still appears the MCH-HC lacks the candela of the PLHv2 and has a less well-defined hotspot, although the MCH-HC-DF is pretty evenly matched (again, despite being rated at 26k cd higher than the PLHv2). The MCH-Duty really blows away all the other lights at this distance. Just look how much light is spilling into that doorway! Candela is important, but lumens do matter.
All that being said, where does this leave me? I'm glad I don't have to pick just one light. If I did, I'd be ok with sacrificing lumens for candela, at least to a point. I heard someone once state that you can make up for a high-candela, low-lumen light by moving the light around, using umbrella lighting, etc., whereas with a high-lumen, low-candela light, there's nothing you can do to extend its reach.
50 yards and in in an indoor setting, I'm partial to the MCH-Duty, if I can get past the overheating issues. Longer distances, give me the HOG PLHv2. I'm really not seeing a need for the HOG OKW in my line of work, and I'm likely going to be selling that one. For EDC, I'm sticking with the MCH-HC—I like the color temperature better than the PLHv2, and it doesn't have the overheating issues that come with the MCH-HC-DF. The PLH5K, I don't really have a use for, but it would be a good fit for a dedicated home defense handgun on a PL350 body, considering the longest shot inside my house is about 12 yards and the spill is welcome in that setting.
Anyway, hope this helps for those on the fence.