For some reason, I'm intrigued.
I hope it's just the whiskey...
For some reason, I'm intrigued.
I hope it's just the whiskey...
Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem
I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude
-Thomas Jefferson
I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.
Unfortunately, terminal performance data obtained in Clear Gelatin is untrustworthy and should be ignored. Test results vary unpredictably from block to block.
A paper (Ballistic Gelatin Comparisons) published on the Hornady Law Enforcement website reports:
Given that these blocks failed FBI standards for calibration each time, it’s unsurprising that the
bullets we fired into them penetrated more deeply than they did in 10% calibrated gelatin.
However, the amount of that extra penetration was a little surprising. We were not prepared for
bullets to penetrate an average of more than 6” deeper into the clear synthetic gelatin than the
organic gelatin, in the heavy clothing test, for example.
Conclusions:
The clear synthetic gelatin currently does not appear to be a suitable substitute for
FBI-standard, 10% calibrated organic gelatin if the bullets will be measured and
evaluated according to FBI performance standards. Because the bullets we tested
behaved so differently in the clear synthetic gelatin versus the 10% calibrated organic
gelatin, it’s not appropriate to use the FBI standards ‒ which were designed to be applied
to 10% calibrated organic gelatin – to measure bullet performance in the clear synthetic
product...
...There is no apparent “conversion” between data derived from 10% organic gelatin
and the current version of the clear synthetic. Unfortunately, our limited test doesn’t
indicate a conversion “shortcut” is likely. It would be convenient if we could develop a
conversion factor that would equate the organic gelatin and clear synthetic gelatin, but
our data indicate that bullet performance is too variable in these mediums to develop a
universal “rule of thumb.”
''Politics is for the present, but an equation is for eternity.'' ―Albert Einstein
Full disclosure per the Pistol-Forum CoC: I am the author of Quantitative Ammunition Selection.
I recall reading of someone that made a 25 cal centerfire pistol round for small game hunting using a single action Ruger and the 22 hornet case blown out straight and trimmed somewhat. I dont recall the performance details but I believe it was in the useful and practical category as compared to 25 auto ballistics performance. A similar round on a J or K frame Smith might be fun.
Edit: This http://www.lasc.us/Fryxell25Hornet.htm
“Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat.”
― Theodore Roosevelt
Or the .257 Jack Rabbit, a shortened 25/20: https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/57f...=1612644498820
Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem
I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude
-Thomas Jefferson
I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.
Why oh why are we treading the path that has failed miserably for years?
Regional Government Sales Manager for Aimpoint, Inc. USA
Co-owner Hardwired Tactical Shooting (HiTS)
I guess I now know how the .45 only guys feel about 9mm. One I can’t imagine that Buffalo Bore will sell enough to justify the research. Anyone buying a Jennings in 25 is probably not going to buy a $50 box of bullets. At this point in my life I can’t imagine anything that would convince me to carry a 25 considering how anemic it’s been up until now. I think I would take my chance with a 22 or a 32 and may even just rely on POM.
My wife went to some kind of gala event in Philadelphia back in 2016(???). She was carrying a hand clutch, and the only pistol that fit in there are my Beretta 950 Jetfire. She sat with the mayor, and some of the conversation was about gun “control”. 🤣💥