Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Fugitive Task Force

  1. #11
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    TEXAS !
    Everyone is a victim of their own frame of reference. Like a lot of federal agencies what / how things are done in USMS varies considerably by location. In some places a DUSM may work other duties for 5 years or more before working any fugitive warrants. In other places everybody does everything. In my city the DUSMs do 6 month rotations between the Courthouse and full time on the fugitive task force. The deputies at the courthouse here still have lower priority warrants assigned to them but they work them around /outside court hours.

    The USMS do get into a lot of shootings, more per capita than any other federal agency I’m aware of. It’s not a coincidence they are among the first federal agencies to get body cameras which had reduced the number of shootings.

    It’s also worth noting there are relatively few DUSM. USMS has supplemented them at courthouses with Detention Officers, Blue Jacket contractors etc for years. The majority of LEOs on the various USMS Fugitive task forces are not DUSM, but rather participants from other local, state and federal agencies.

    While there are still full time fugitive guys in the Bureau, and the Bureau does assimilate state and local cases (particularly those with international aspects) IME most offices have a single agent as with a full time or collateral fugitive coordinator.

  2. #12
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Maryland
    Ironically enough, two DUSM's in D.C. prevailed in an OIS several days ago. Of course, WaPo published an offender-sympathetic article in which the decedent's mother (who wasn't there and isn't quoting any witnesses0 asserts her son posed no threat and that an agency as well-funded as USMS should have body cameras.

  3. #13
    banana republican blues's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Blue Ridge Mtns
    Quote Originally Posted by jnc36rcpd View Post
    Ironically enough, two DUSM's in D.C. prevailed in an OIS several days ago. Of course, WaPo published an offender-sympathetic article in which the decedent's mother (who wasn't there and isn't quoting any witnesses0 asserts her son posed no threat and that an agency as well-funded as USMS should have body cameras.
    Apparently he was a day late turning his life around.
    There's nothing civil about this war.

  4. #14
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    TEXAS !
    Quote Originally Posted by jnc36rcpd View Post
    Ironically enough, two DUSM's in D.C. prevailed in an OIS several days ago. Of course, WaPo published an offender-sympathetic article in which the decedent's mother (who wasn't there and isn't quoting any witnesses0 asserts her son posed no threat and that an agency as well-funded as USMS should have body cameras.
    USMS is in the process of rolling out body cameras. They’ve had them here for over 6 months.

  5. #15
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Maryland
    Quote Originally Posted by blues View Post
    Apparently he was a day late turning his life around.
    There was much ink spilled on that issue as well.

  6. #16
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Maryland
    Quote Originally Posted by HCM View Post
    USMS is in the process of rolling out body cameras. They’ve had them here for over 6 months.

    The Post mentioned that as well.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •