Right now we still have the 147gr HST.
We’ve apparently purchased Winchester 124gr +P ammo…I don’t know what kind. I don’t think it’s Ranger. No idea why that was picked…there may not even be a good reason (I think our full-time firearms guys are jackasses and I’m under the impression that they’re not huge fans of me, either).
Well I guess my question now is how many generations are there total, and how many generations have a double cannelure?
Because these two were bought 6-8 years apart and have a complete different label/marketing/colors on the boxes as you can see in my pics.
I believ the LE community noticed the more stark performance changes regarding more penetration less expansion within the last 2-3 years…
Either way, I’m not trying to overcomplicate anything, nor am I saying these new ones I just got are a different generation, they just look slightly different.
No shit Sherlock.
I’m not the one who implied that this was a design change while failing to post any credible statement from Federal that this was a design change.
The bullet shown on the left is from the lot of 1st generation 147 grain HST that I tested and posted an article about in 2016. The bullet on the right is from a new lot of 147 grain HST that I recently received directly from Federal. The gen 1 bullet shows a cleanly formed lead core. The bullet from the new lot also shows a cleanly formed lead core, unlike the sloppily manufactured bullet posted in the OP.
...
Last edited by Molon; 03-15-2023 at 05:36 PM.
Member of the General Population
Correct, and when I was challenged by you on that I acknowledged your point that I was spitballing and simply posited that we both were. I also said I'd be curious to know the correct answer. I didn't double down, I expressed curiosity.
You've provided evidence that your supposition was correct, which I appreciate and acknowledge. I do not appreciate the way you chose to speak to me when I was nothing but courteous. I'm not an idiot, and I genuinely love learning new gun stuff. It's fine that I was wrong (even if it does give me some minor Federal QC concerns), but I had a basis for what I thought the situation was and welcomed correction. I'm sure you've been wrong before, and perhaps have even stated a belief without having the facts handy to back it up, and I'm sure you appreciated it when people were graceful about that.
I have zero interest in a pissing contest, you contribute good quality content to this forum, which I've expressed appreciation for before. I'd just like one of the only stress-free areas of my life (PF) to stay stress-free. If you want an apology that I posted a thought without a citation on my lunch break, you've got it.
Last edited by LockedBreech; 03-15-2023 at 09:04 PM.
State Government Attorney | Beretta, Glock, CZ & S&W Fan
"Gunfighting is a thinking man's game. So we might want to bring thinking back into it."-MDFA
Beware of my temper, and the dog that I've found...