Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: USPSA Carry Optics - Shadow 2 Modifications

  1. #1

    USPSA Carry Optics - Shadow 2 Modifications

    Good afternoon!

    I have a CZ Shadow 2 Optic Ready SA/DA. I am new to USPSA, but I have the itch to make modifications/ adjustments, so I feel like I should at least make a list of what I can/should do and then pass them over to the wifey periodically for financial approval. I am curious what I can and can't do to the pistol that keeps it in the Carry Optic category.

    I feel like the trigger is a little far forward, is there a way for me to bring it back at all?
    What about Slide Porting. Does that add a value at all or is that strictly aesthetic.
    Bigger mags, currently have 17+1?
    What are recommended changes.

    The pistol works great as is. I am definitely not to the skill level that my pistol is at.


    Thanks for the advice!

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Location
    Idaho
    Quote Originally Posted by jrobinson View Post
    Good afternoon!

    I have a CZ Shadow 2 Optic Ready SA/DA. I am new to USPSA, but I have the itch to make modifications/ adjustments, so I feel like I should at least make a list of what I can/should do and then pass them over to the wifey periodically for financial approval. I am curious what I can and can't do to the pistol that keeps it in the Carry Optic category.

    I feel like the trigger is a little far forward, is there a way for me to bring it back at all?
    What about Slide Porting. Does that add a value at all or is that strictly aesthetic.
    Bigger mags, currently have 17+1?
    What are recommended changes.

    The pistol works great as is. I am definitely not to the skill level that my pistol is at.


    Thanks for the advice!
    There’s a number of us here who use a Shadow 2 for CO division, so you may get some varying answers.

    I had my gun milled for CO before the S2OR was available in the US, and this was also when the weight limit was restricted for 45 oz (including optic and an empty mag). So I had mine milled for the optic as well as some slide lightening (ports) to reduce weight to get me under the limit. With optic and empty mag, my gun weighs in @ 44.1 oz. Then a year or two later they increased the weight limit to 59 oz. But when I had my second Shadow 2 setup for CO (two is one, one is none, et.al.) I had the same shop mill the slide lightening as well bc I wanted both guns to feel and recoil the same.

    It might be bc I shot 1911’s for so long, but a gun that weighs around 43 oz is the sweet spot for me, not these super heavy 50+ oz guns that some people like.

    You can bring the DA trigger back a little by installing a short DA disco. CGW and CZC both make one. Some fitting may be required.

    I run Taran Tactical mag extensions with the Grams follower and spring. When attached to the Mecgar 17 rnd mag I get 23+1 capacity. You can buy the mag kit (extension, spring, follower, and 17 rnd mag tube) from Ben Stoeger’s Pro Shop, or just buy the mag extensions, spring, and follower separately.

    First thing I do to all my Shadow 2’s is to replace the mainspring, recoil spring, trigger return spring, and firing pin spring with lighter ones from CGW. I also drop in an extended firing pin and floating trigger pin also from CGW. And some light polishing of the internals. That netted me a 6 lb DA and 2 lb SA trigger. I also prefer a flat (or less curved) trigger and one of my S2’s has the CZC flat DA/SA trigger and the other one has a semi-curved trigger from Armory Craft (but I’m hearing that CGW also offers a DA/SA trigger that is less curved than OFM).

    Good luck with your Shadow 2!

  3. #3
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    NH
    My Shadow 2s are set up almost exactly like ECK’s with the exception of the extended firing pins. I have to use Federal primers when using an 11.5# mainspring because of this.

    The optic mounting plates have been somewhat difficult to get for the OR model, depending on the footprint. I had been wanting to get a back up for over a year before I found them in stock.

  4. #4
    I have several setups that include lightened slides, lightened frames, unmodified frame, and unmodified slide. Just like @ECK, started when the limit was 45 oz except I went further and had even frames lightened internally. I prefer my 9 mm game guns not to go too far past 40 oz unloaded.
    Personally I feel that the unmodified slide cycles closest to the optimal but I don't like total static weight of unmodified gun so my match gun has unmodded slide and lightened frame. Practice gun is the opposite, and there's really not a ton of difference how they shoot. All of my guns have static weights around 40 oz without a mag.
    Internally all are identical with 85C triggers, floating trigger pins, short discos, match hammers, and 13 lbs hammer springs. Firing pins and springs are stock.
    Doesn't read posts longer than two paragraphs.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    out of here
    The RRK or reach reduction kit is functionally nice.

    Barrel bushing is nice and help a little.

    I personally liked the recoil timing of the full heavy slide. So much so that the 4 lightened slides I had done when light CO was a thing just sit around.

    My advice would be springs and RRK then practice.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Location
    Idaho
    A couple weeks ago I helped a friend install a CGW race hammer and adjustable sear in his Black/blue Shadow 2. Also dropped in the CGW TRS, trigger pin, and 11.5 lb mainspring. He already had the extended firing pin installed.

    With the stock hammer annd sear and just the spring swaps we ended up with a 6.5/2.5 lb trigger pull. With some additional polishing I’m sure we could get that down to 6/2 (DA/SA).

    But he also wanted to install a CGW sear and hammer. Post install, trigger pull in SA went up to 3-ish lbs and change but it was a more crisp pull (more like a 1911 than the rolling break of the stock CZ). Since it was my friends gun I left it up to him and he preferred the heavier but crisper SA break since he also shoots a 2011 open gun. And had it not been for the trigger gauge he would not have known it was heavier.

    Personally I like the way the SA feels with stock hammer and sear, but some people like a crisp break with very defined wall. But IMO the S2’s trigger system only need a few spring changes and it’s good to go.

  7. #7
    Realistically nothing "needs" to be done, factory form its a great pistol.
    Having said that I put in the CGW pro kit which included a reach reduction kit. The reach reduction for me places my finger on the DA trigger the way I like.
    I prefer how the gun returns with a 10lbs recoil spring and I mostly use CCI primers with an 11.5lbs hammer spring and extended firing pin.
    So far I like the Henning mag extensions the best with a mec-gar 17 round mag for a total of 21 rounds.
    I have a few match only mags with the Grams spring and follower alloing for 23+1.
    The new Rune tactical spring and follower allow for 24+1.
    I wouldn't make these your only mags unless you like replacing them a lot. The special springs wear faster.
    MBX claims 24+1 as well.
    I am done buying the taran tactical extensions after seeing them crack from use indoors on concrete.
    YMMV

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Location
    Idaho
    A couple weeks ago I helped a friend install a CGW race hammer and adjustable sear in his Black/blue Shadow 2. Also dropped in the CGW TRS, trigger pin, and 11.5 lb mainspring. He already had the extended firing pin installed.

    With the stock hammer annd sear and just the spring swaps we ended up with a 6.5/2.5 lb trigger pull. With some additional polishing I’m sure we could get that down to 6/2 (DA/SA).

    But he also wanted to install a CGW sear and hammer. Post install, trigger pull in SA went up to 3-ish lbs and change but it was a more crisp pull (more like a 1911 than the rolling break of the stock CZ). Since it was my friends gun I left it up to him and he preferred the heavier but crisper SA break since he also shoots a 2011 open gun. And had it not been for the trigger gauge he would not have known it was heavier.

    Personally I like the way the SA feels with stock hammer and sear, but some people like a crisp break with very defined wall. But IMO the S2’s trigger system only need a few spring changes and it’s good to go.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Akimbo_sammiches View Post
    I have a few match only mags with the Grams spring and follower alloing for 23+1.
    You've had a good success with these? I've had Henning's extensions from day one and while I can stick 23 in with an Uplula, the number of times I've had slide failing to strip the first round has been high enough for me to stop. I use Henning's + Grams guts for easy 22+1, reloadable, and I have a couple of mags with cut coils that give me 23+1. I try to use them sparingly.
    Never heard of Rune Tactical, so I just ordered theirs to try.
    Doesn't read posts longer than two paragraphs.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by YVK View Post
    You've had a good success with these? I've had Henning's extensions from day one and while I can stick 23 in with an Uplula, the number of times I've had slide failing to strip the first round has been high enough for me to stop. I use Henning's + Grams guts for easy 22+1, reloadable, and I have a couple of mags with cut coils that give me 23+1. I try to use them sparingly.
    Never heard of Rune Tactical, so I just ordered theirs to try.
    So far so good. 23+1 reloadable. Is your mag tube a mecgar 17? There seems to be a lot of different experiences of what works. It could perhaps be due to overall length of the ammo, not sure but I load way short compared to most

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •