I had never thought about the TBL flag as a desecration, but the comments here have me thinking about this.
On the one hand, i do have a revrance for our flag and do not like to see it disrespected or abused.
On the other hand, since the 1800's, there has been a history in this country of presidential candidates using the U.S. flag emblazoned with their image and/or slogans as campaign items. Various states put some stylized version on their license plates, or have in the past. Sometimes sold at extra cost as vanity plates. I constantly see U.S. flags with words or symbols of the U.S. Army, Marines, Navy, etc., added.
There is no enforceable law on the topic and so no court has defined desecration. Generally to desecrate something is to to treat it with disrespect, or irreverence or in a profane manner. Regarding some thing like a TBL flag or flag with the marine Corps emblem on it, is that really disrectful? Such concepts are really subjective, as opposed to burning the flag publicly, scrawling graffiti on it, walking on it, etc.
If Lincoln could put his name on the flag while running for President and that is not desecration, maybe the TBL flag is not a desecration either, when flown to show support for our nation of laws and those who enforce those laws? The flag is defined in federal law as "any flag of the United States, or any part thereof, made of any substance, of any size, in a form commonly displayed." So the flag includes pins and buttons and whatever. Not sure about this. Maybe it all depends on the purpose or intent of the alteration? I need to think on it some more. Still the REASON that LAPD took down the flag is BS.
Is this American Legion pin a desecration?