Yeah, but the bakery is listed under the same name as the website owner.Originally Posted by Stephanie B
Yeah, but the bakery is listed under the same name as the website owner.
I suspect that there is a good reason why, other than British service revolvers, that break-top centerfire revolvers disappeared from production around the turn of the last century.
If we have to march off into the next world, let us walk there on the bodies of our enemies.
My inner nerd immediately screamed "DO WANT!".
A couple of random observations. It says it has an "enclosed magazine". Ummm, ok? Even though this is supposed to be a .357, one set of pictures shows it with .22LR and the background as you scroll down the page the background pics shows it with 9mm.
And the S&W at the top of the page is backwards.
Nothing so needs reforming as other people's habits - Mark Twain
Tact is the knack of making a point without making an enemy / Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?
Anyone else get "Liberator II" vibes from that?
We may lose and we may win, but we will never be here again.......
Despite claiming a patent in their SHOT show booth listing, patent search comes up dry. Guess we’ll see.
If I mention a 'just because' top break - I want one of those new Indian 32 SW Long top breaks they make for women's self-defense at an enormous price. Why - just because.
I will look and see when I am at SHOT this year.
This thing has basically none of the concealment advantages of a standard revolver layout, right?
"After 200 years, the REVOLVER REVOLUTION is here" is what that website says.
I'm trying to think of what practical revolver existed in 1822.
If we have to march off into the next world, let us walk there on the bodies of our enemies.
The Collier flintlock revolver was patented in 1818.
Was it "practical?" Better than a pair of single shots, granted that it worked well.
When I first saw the thread title, I thought it was a misspelling of Zinc, as used in cheap guns.
Code Name: JET STREAM
Reply With Quote