Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: Holosun SRO Competitor Inbound

  1. #1
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    DFW

    Holosun SRO Competitor Inbound

    Just posted on their IG

    Name:  9A054306-1C71-4CCD-A4B4-F2D202EBBCC6.jpg
Views: 708
Size:  22.1 KB

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    out of here
    Ohpleaseohpleaseohplease

  3. #3
    Member GearFondler's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Southeast Louisiana
    Looks potentially more drop proof at least... But it might need one of these to be legal:

  4. #4
    Deadeye Dick Clusterfrack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Wokelandia

    Holosun SRO Competitor Inbound

    I’ll admit to being pretty excited about this. Hoping for:
    Closed emitter
    At least as big a window as the SRO
    Good glass (or at least better than the crap Trijicon uses)
    RMR footprint
    “There is no growth in the comfort zone.”--Jocko Willink
    "You can never have too many knives." --Joe Ambercrombie

  5. #5
    About every other week, I wonder why Holosun has not filled this obvious niche given all their other product offerings. Definitely excited, and hope it's an early Christmas present.
    Likes pretty much everything in every caliber.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    out of here
    Quote Originally Posted by Clusterfrack View Post
    I’ll admit to being pretty excited about this. Hoping for:
    Closed emitter
    At least as big a window as the SRO
    Good glass (or at least better than the crap Trijicon uses)
    RMR footprint
    Name:  06ACD73B-7E29-43EF-87D9-E6756F6C8588.jpg
Views: 686
Size:  26.4 KB

    I’d settle for NO FALSE FRICKING DOT.

    They said they can’t do an enclosed with RMR footprint without adapter because screw placement. That’s why the EPS is K cut.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    out of here
    Okay, a little less excited.

    I increased the brightness and compared to a deltapoint it seems similar width but a little taller.

    Name:  AC9C3EAB-0F6E-4756-BC84-998E5CA032DA.jpg
Views: 698
Size:  33.2 KB

    Name:  07BFB3D0-EDE0-4D6E-9548-CCC4E8C53625.jpg
Views: 684
Size:  32.0 KB

  8. #8
    That figures! I bought an SRO two months ago because there wasn't anything comparable on the market (I refuse to buy SIG USA products made in the Cohen era).

  9. #9
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Michigan
    I know this may not be popular but I would like to see them make the EPS and EPS Carry more readily available before we move on to something else. I am happy to see atleast one optics company continuing to push out new products people want though. I suppose you can't have progression without new product releases.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Exiledviking View Post
    That figures! I bought an SRO two months ago because there wasn't anything comparable on the market (I refuse to buy SIG USA products made in the Cohen era).
    Like most, I am anti Sig/Cohen. For that reason I limit my Sig purchases to the 365 Family, X5 Legion and AXG, the Rattler and the Romeo 1, 2 and 3 optics. Oh, and the 220/226/229.
    Likes pretty much everything in every caliber.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •