Well, he's got you there--LOL!Originally Posted by Archer1440
Well, he's got you there--LOL!
He beat me to itWell, he's got you there--LOL!
Im not trying to argue.. being Im right
The 856 frame is slightly has a slightly larger window to accommodate the larger diameter cylinder ..
Taurus actually did what Charter did squeeze a larger cylinder is a slightly larger frame ..
I sorta surprised how testy ur are being…
I personally don’t have a 605/905 frame
But I had a couple of buddies do a bit of measuring.. proving what I already knew
I know Im not a engineer 🤣
But I have been around the block a few times 🤣
BTW tell your engineers to build more 692’s 3 inch barrels and drop the ports
One thing people forget .. the 85/605/905 Taurus small frame is a bit larger than a S&W J frame…
But the 856 frame is a great idea .. really has one me over
Last edited by Buckeye63; 11-29-2022 at 08:16 AM.
This wouldn't be the first time Handgun Hero was wrong.
Absolutely not
Umm... When a person who access to the technical drawings information provides an answer it is a little rude to say "You are wrong". It is easy to see why some of the SMEs from the past don't post very often anymore.
As an engineer myself, when a marketing person tells you they “have access to the technical drawings” (which isn’t what was said here, to be fair), better ask for receipts.
Right or wrong .. I do like my 856UL
😊
There's a gun I wish we could get more of in the states. Aluminum is tough right now
Reply With Quote