Page 13 of 20 FirstFirst ... 31112131415 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 194

Thread: Battle of the Budget Wide Bodies. BUL vs Springfield Armory!

  1. #121
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    TEXAS !
    Quote Originally Posted by Tokarev View Post
    Here's another SDS Import. This one under the Tisas label instead of the MAC label.

    At this price, which will probably translate to $675 or maybe even lower, the battle of the budget hicap has been won.


    https://sdsimports.com/1911-carry-b9r-ds/

    Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
    Only if it works.

  2. #122
    Quote Originally Posted by HCM View Post
    Only if it works.
    Oh, yes. The reliability needs to be there either out of the box or with only minor tweaks.

    I'm generally confident that it will be. Maybe not in each and every pistol but in the majority of them. I base this off the mostly positive reviews given by Tisas 1911 owners here and on other forums.

    It would be easy to dismiss the MAC or Tisas guns as gimcrackery but I think they'll end up being a solid product. Without seeing one in person yet I'm going to say they're a better gun than the EAA counterpart.

    Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

  3. #123

  4. #124

  5. #125

  6. #126
    More info on the Apollo 11.


  7. #127
    Humble Marskman at SHOT 2024



    Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

  8. #128


    Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

  9. #129


    Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

  10. #130
    I find it interesting that Skip's Gunz or whatever that guy's youtu.be channel is says the early LFA guns had EGW hammer parts. He says the current guns appear to have internals that are OEM equivalent to Staccato parts. I had assumed the LFA guns would have MIM hammers, sears, etc.



    Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •