Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: .357 XTP Variants

  1. #1
    Site Supporter entropy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Far Upper Midwest. Lower Midwest When I Absolutely Have To

    .357 XTP Variants

    Anyone load/shoot/compare the 158gr XTP (#35750) vs the 158gr XTPFP (#35780)?

    I’m curious at the penetration, expansion and performance of the two comparatively. I’ve kinda given up (at least temporarily) on using hard cast in my particular M28. I’ve found it difficult to zero in on something it likes. It seems to eat and spit out XTPs well though, so I’m going to just focus on that for the time being.

    Thanks
    Working diligently to enlarge my group size.

  2. #2
    I'd be very skeptical of the FP opening as well as the regular XTP. Might be great in a lever rifle but they have the FTX for that.

    Tagged for curiosity.

  3. #3
    Site Supporter entropy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Far Upper Midwest. Lower Midwest When I Absolutely Have To
    Never thought of the lever gun angle. I could call Hornady too...ask the source. Maybe I’ll do that tomorrow.
    Working diligently to enlarge my group size.

  4. #4
    The Nostomaniac 03RN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    New Hampshire
    I haven't tested the 158s but the 140s hold together in water from rifle and handgun. 1150fps to 1650fps
    Name:  20200305_124403.jpg
Views: 296
Size:  32.9 KB

  5. #5
    The Nostomaniac 03RN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Name:  download.jpg
Views: 307
Size:  65.2 KB

  6. #6
    Site Supporter entropy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Far Upper Midwest. Lower Midwest When I Absolutely Have To
    Mr. Xxxx,

    Thanks for the inquiry. The 35780 FP-XTP will have a higher velocity rating in case used out of longer barrels or slightly faster cartridges. For your application either will do the trick and should have about the same expansion velocities. We appreciate your business.

    Thank you


    I’m going to stick with your above graph nonetheless.
    Working diligently to enlarge my group size.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by 03RN View Post
    Name:  download.jpg
Views: 307
Size:  65.2 KB
    Thanks for posting that graph. I'd heard about it, but never seen. Very useful. Thank you.

  8. #8
    Site Supporter entropy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Far Upper Midwest. Lower Midwest When I Absolutely Have To
    Bullets arriving today along with some 2400. Hopefully it will be a short, effective tuning process.
    Working diligently to enlarge my group size.

  9. #9
    Site Supporter OlongJohnson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    "carbine-infested rural (and suburban) areas"
    Quote Originally Posted by Spartan1980 View Post
    I'd be very skeptical of the FP opening as well as the regular XTP. Might be great in a lever rifle but they have the FTX for that.
    Check the BCs. Without looking it up, I think I remember the BC of the FTX is lower than the FP.
    .
    -----------------------------------------
    Not another dime.

  10. #10
    Site Supporter entropy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Far Upper Midwest. Lower Midwest When I Absolutely Have To
    Name:  BCC5B1AF-27B5-42C8-B608-D7554EFC44B4.jpg
Views: 181
Size:  70.8 KB

    Small spread loaded up. 13.0, 13.5, 14.0. I have 14.0 listed as a good load from 2014. I never got velocity tho. This time they’ll go across the LabRadar. Looking thru data, I can poke above 14.0 a ways, but I’ll see what 14 even gives me first.
    Working diligently to enlarge my group size.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •