Page 133 of 145 FirstFirst ... 3383123131132133134135143 ... LastLast
Results 1,321 to 1,330 of 1446

Thread: Active Shooter Uvalde TX Elementary School

  1. #1321
    Site Supporter HeavyDuty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Not very bright but does lack ambition
    Quote Originally Posted by Glenn E. Meyer View Post
    Had a sensitive places discussion regarding Uvalde and the upcoming NYS state law. It was at a USPSA match where some folks were shooting carry guns - like 365s or G48s. As Karl Rehn has shown performance was down a touch even for practiced shooters.

    I was arguing that schools should not be banned apriori but teachers who could demonstrate competency might carry. A high school teacher brought up an interesting point. He is a big guy (as compared to 5' 6" old toot me). His carry gun was the 365 in an IWB. He said that it is not rare for him to have to wrassle with students and he think the risk of being disarmed, losing the gun, etc. is too great and thus he's not that supportive of carry. I asked what if the killer gets in your room - he says that's a point. But I see his point. I suggested pocket carry might be more unobtrusive and more secure. He says that's a point. As a college prof - I never had to wrassle a student. High school that's different. Middle school - perhaps. Now, pocket guns aren't that easy to shoot (yes, I practice, took classes with snubbies), shot specific small gun matches. Interesting discussion. Could I defend my classroom with a J frame - who knows? A G42?
    I dont want to derail this thread, but being partnered up with a teacher this is of personal interest so I started a separate thread for discussion. https://pistol-forum.com/showthread....37#post1374037
    Ken

    BBI: ...”you better not forget the safe word because shit's about to get weird”...
    revchuck38: ...”mo' ammo is mo' betta' unless you're swimming or on fire.”

  2. #1322
    Quote Originally Posted by Glenn E. Meyer View Post
    Could I defend my classroom with a J frame - who knows? A G42?
    Charl Van Wyk routed grenade and assault rile armed terrorists from his church in '93 with his J-frame, though he was seated in the pews rather than giving a sermon.

  3. #1323
    Quote Originally Posted by Totem Polar View Post
    I met MG a while back, and instantly liked and respected him. The dude is a total stud and a very lucid speaker in person. That said, this made me LoL. The amount of dough that retired SOF can command for up-marketed coursework is really something. I mean, I’m pretty sure I remember Fieldcraft having had an atlatl course on the books; no reason not to float an active shooter response skew, since it’ll sell out.
    I don't have anything against Mike Glover, I'm a big proponent of seizing opportunities that may enrich your life financially or otherwise. If that's leaning on experience and military service, good for them. I look at Fieldcraft Survival more as a lifestyle brand rather than just a shooting and tactics school like Gunsite or Thunder Ranch. One could argue they're the Patagonia/North Face/Filson of the training industry. I don't mean that negatively. There's a market there and they're capitalizing on it.

  4. #1324
    Site Supporter SeriousStudent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Texas
    The Texas House of Representatives has issued its 77-page report on the shooting:

    https://www.house.texas.gov/_media/p...tee-Report.pdf

  5. #1325
    Quote Originally Posted by ccmdfd View Post
    I work in the same type of environment.

    If we were to want schools to switch over to this type of system, would need to come up with some way to keep a bad person from ambushing a teacher or other school worker in order to obtain their badge and then have free access to the entire School.
    I hadn't read these suggestions before I posted in the other thread. In a school setting the teacher would only have a keycard for THEIR classroom. The admin office should have the ability to overide and lock all doors.

    Still have to use keys to get into the building.
    Adding nothing to the conversation since 2015....

  6. #1326
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    TEXAS !
    Quote Originally Posted by SeriousStudent View Post
    The Texas House of Representatives has issued its 77-page report on the shooting:

    https://www.house.texas.gov/_media/p...tee-Report.pdf
    There a lot to digest in the report but two sections address matters which have been points of contention in this thread.

    Regarding the inaccurate claim (improvidently repeated in the ALERRT report) that a rifle armed UPD officer missed an opportunity to shoot the suspect outside the school.

    From pages 42 & 43:

    At around the same time, another Uvalde Police officer, Sgt. Daniel Coronado, also arrived on the scene. He wore his uniform and a vest, but he had no rifle plates for protection. Sgt. Coronado first stopped his patrol vehicle at the south end of South Grove Street where it dead-ends into Geraldine Street. He saw two Uvalde Police officers at the intersection who had arrived before him. Sgt. Coronado exited his vehicle, heard gunfire, and asked where the shooting was occurring. At first, the other officers said they did not know, and they could not see the attacker.113
    One of those officers testified to the Committee that, based on the sound of echoes, he believed the shooter had fired in their direction.114 That officer saw children dressed in bright colors in the playground, all running away. Then, at a distance exceeding 100 yards, he saw a person dressed in black, also running away. Thinking that the person dressed in black was the attacker, he raised his rifle and asked Sgt. Coronado for permission to shoot.115
    111 Committee testimony of SSgt. Eduardo Canales, Uvalde Police (June 29, 2022). 112 Committee testimony of Lt. Javier Martinez, Uvalde Police (June 29, 2022).
    113 Committee testimony of Sgt. Daniel Coronado, Uvalde Police (June 20, 2022).
    114 The Committee is unaware of any public reporting about this episode that has identified the police officer by name. The officer testified before the Committee. In light of the Committee’s determination that the description of this episode by ALERRT—then widely reported by the media—is likely incorrect, we likewise decline to identify him by name for purposes of this report.
    115 See, e.g., Committee testimony of Sgt. Daniel Coronado, Uvalde Police (June 20, 2022). Robb Cmte Rpt • 42 of 77

    Sgt. Coronado testified he heard the request, and he hesitated. He knew there were children present. He considered the risk of shooting a child, and he quickly recalled his training that officers are responsible for every round that goes downrange.116
    According to the officer who made the request, there was no opportunity for Sgt. Coronado to respond before they heard on the radio that the attacker was running toward the school. The officers testified to the Committee that it turned out that the person they had seen dressed in black was not the attacker, but instead it was Robb Elementary Coach Abraham Gonzales.117 Coach Gonzales had been on his way to the parking lot to leave the school after his lunch duty when he heard a gunshot and then Coach Garcia’s report about the attacker over the radio. He told the children around him to run away.118 Robb Elementary fourth grade teachers Lynn
    116 Id.
    117 Part 1 of the ALERRT report, included the following narrative in its timeline:
    Prior to the suspect’s entry into the building at 11:33:00, according to statements, a Uvalde Police Officer on scene at the crash site observed the suspect carrying a rifle outside the west hall entry. The officer, armed with a rifle, asked his supervisor for permission to shoot the suspect. However, the supervisor either did not hear or responded too late. The officer turned to get confirmation from his supervisor and when he turned back to address the suspect, he had entered the west hallway unabated. (OS per investigating officer interview).
    ALERRT, Robb Elementary School Attack Response Assessment and Recommendations, at 4 (July 6, 2022). The ALERRT report appears to rely on an interview conducted by Texas Ranger Michael Schraub, who interviewed the officer in question on May 27, 2022. That report stated:
    While in route to the scene Officer [A] advised Officer [B] located the shooter. However, the shooter was located a couple blocks away from the dispatch location. Officer [A] advised upon arrival, the shooter was shooting at Officer [B]. Officer [A] advised he positioned his patrol vehicle while ducking down and grabbing his rifle between the shooter and Officer [B]. Officer [A] advised the purpose was to protect Officer [B] while he exited his patrol vehicle. Officer [A] advised his vehicle was not struck by any projectiles.
    Officer [A] advised upon exiting his patrol vehicle he observed the shooter in the distance. When he observed the shooter, Officer [A] advised there were kids in the background. Therefore, Officer [A] advised he hesitated shooting at the suspect. Officer [A] advised he requested permission to shoot, looked back very briefly at Sergeant Coronado, but never received a response. Upon looking back the direction of the shooter Officer [A] advised the shooter was gone.
    DPS interview (May 27, 2022). In a subsequent DPS interview, the officer in question described the person he saw not as “the shooter” but as “a person in black toward the back of the school, but kids were behind that individual.” DPS interview (June 13, 2022). These DPS interview reports do not include or support the detail suggested in the ALERRT report that a Uvalde police officer “observed the suspect carrying a rifle outside the west hall entry.” Based on its review of evidence to date, this Committee concludes that it is more likely that the officer saw Coach Gonzales dressed in black near a group of schoolchildren than that there was an actual opportunity to shoot the attacker from over 100 yards away, as assumed by ALERRT’s partial report.
    118 DPS interview of Coach Abraham Gonzales (May 28, 2022).
    Regarding breaching, keys, the unlocked door and the inaccurate claim by by Mike Glover about what BORTAC et. al. we’re made aware of prior to entry.

    According to the rifle rated shield uses in the entry was supplied by the U.S. Marshals.

    From page 61:

    BORTAC Acting Commander Paul Guerrero came to the north side of the building upon his arrival at Robb Elementary. In a post-incident statement, he said he was advised “that the subject had possibly shot multiple children and was still in the classroom.” He requested surveillance through the back windows of Rooms 111 and 112 to possibly deploy gas as they made entry. He then went to retrieve a Halligan tool from his car.195 The school’s surveillance camera shows the arrival of a Halligan breaching tool at 12:35 p.m..196 The Committee received no evidence that the arrival of the breaching tool ever was communicated to Chief Arredondo or anyone else on the south side of the building.
    According to his statement, Cdr. Guerrero attempted to pry open a door in the hallway to see if the Halligan tool would work. He determined it would take too long and dangerously expose
    an officer to gunfire coming from inside the classroom. He observed that the classroom doorway had multiple holes consistent with bullet holes, and he did not want to expose or jeopardize the safety and lives of any officers by trying to pry the door open.197 Cdr. Guerrero then obtained a master key from an officer at the scene. As he made his way to the classroom door, an officer advised him to try it on another door first. He attempted to open another door along the hallway, and it did not work. He saw a few Border Patrol agents and advised them to start setting up for a triage situation of mass casualties. He then received a second master key, which he successfully used to open another door.198
    Working with the BORTAC team, Cdr. Guerrero had another agent use the rifle-rated ballistic shield to give him cover as he opened the classroom door. Cdr. Guerrero placed the key in the door to Room 111 and opened the door. (Cdr. Guerrero’s contemporaneous report stated that he unlocked the door,199 but as explained above, there is reason to question whether the door was actually locked.)
    Last edited by HCM; 07-17-2022 at 04:44 PM.

  7. #1327
    Site Supporter Sensei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Greece/NC
    Quote Originally Posted by camel View Post
    Hospitals are different. Sadly each person in the medical field at least knows there job. Access control in a hospital are greater than schools. I don’t mean to knock a teacher. But. It’s a different environment.
    Half the people employed in a hospital are not in the “medical field.” They are janitors, maintenance, food services, information tech, laundry, finance, etc. Somehow, they manage to reach up, grab the badge that is hanging from their lapel, and waive it in front of a sensor that then unlocks the door. Amazingly, they are still able to push on the door to open it despite having already performed difficult gross motor movements.

    Moreover, they all have various levels of access that allows them to perform their duties without giving them free reign of the hospital. For example, my badge will not allow me to enter the women’s locker room despite me occasionally identifying as a woman. I also do not have access to the medication room or central pharmacy which complicates my dating life (ketamine really helps break the ice).
    I like my rifles like my women - short, light, fast, brown, and suppressed.

  8. #1328
    Site Supporter ccmdfd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Southeastern NC
    Quote Originally Posted by Sensei View Post
    I also do not have access to the medication room or central pharmacy which complicates my dating life (ketamine really helps break the ice).
    Did you go to the Bill Cosby School of Medicine?

  9. #1329
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    E. Wash.




    Ugh. That's all I can say.

  10. #1330
    Article by Kyle Lamb in the Federalist on Uvalde:

    https://thefederalist.com/2022/07/15...erm=2022-07-15

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •