There’s a lot of good here so I’ll just add one thing from personal experience. Others are right that if you want to choose based on performance, you need to have an objective measure of it. I’d recommend making that comparison using some drill or exercise that makes you think about non-shooting things with the gun in your hands so that you have to divert brain power away from running the gun. This may tell you that one gun or the other “clicks” for you. The Casino Drill comes to mind but there are multiple options.
I had an experience along these lines after working very diligently on getting proficient with a trio of P99s, then just shooting a 1911 for fun. I performed equally with both, but getting that level of performance with the P99 took A LOT of conscious, focused effort on every detail of what I was doing with the pistol, and the 1911 (the pistol I “grew up on”) took way less. For one thing, this is good because if I have to use the gun under stress, I hopefully have more brainpower to devote to the problem and can run the gun sufficiently at a subconscious level.
On top of that, after switching, I do not need nearly as much live and dry fire to maintain the same level of proficiency. That’s a huge benefit when life happens. It also keeps me from forming any serious desire to switch or add handguns, since it’s likely to be more work in addition to more money. Whatever way the 1911 supposedly falls short compared to something else, it’s likely not enough to overcome these advantages.
So work on finding out if any of your options work similarly for you. That, or just go with Glock and be done with it. That’s probably the one other thing I could’ve done and been perfectly happy with.