Regarding recoil: My C has less felt recoil than my all steel Kimber HD Pro Carry II despite the weight difference. My all steel Springfield EMP, despite being heavy, is also very snappy. I suppose the recoil master should receive a good deal of credit.
Yeah, I meant more in line with as compared to a 9mm Officer or CCO. So it's sounding like it's pretty much mainly just the barrel length, and that it's a bull barrel...kind of like a Detonics, but with an Officer's frame and an extra half inch of barrel? I always did kind of want a 38 Super Detonics to go with my 45..
I had no clue the 507k was basically direct mount with using the Dawson plate as a spacer. Very cool.
Last edited by CDFIII; 05-08-2022 at 08:22 PM.
Does anyone have the C and the C2? Curious on how much difference there is in grip circumference and concealment.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have a couple of P's and the C. Grip circumference is definitely noticeable. I don't find it near as bad as going from a G19 to a 43. Of course nothing scientific just going by feel, I find the transition much easier.Originally Posted by Trukinjp13
I had both. The C2 makes no sense to me, all the "down sides" of a short barrel with none of the concealment benefits. The C2 grip is somewhere between a G19 and G17 length, and fatter than either by a bit. The C is slim and light and warm and cuddly like a new labrador puppy.
I do love me some puppies [emoji1787][emoji1787]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm dog-sitting my in-laws' 17 month old female lab right now. Ehr Mehr Gehrd. Every time my wife walks in the house, she laughs at how everything I'm wearing is covered in blond hair. I could go find a super hot blonde goomah right now and get away with murder...
Is the length of the C grip roughly the same as described, somewhere between a G19 and a G17, but obviously thinner?
In my experience and opinion, yes.
Reply With Quote