If it locks up on a cutout on the barrel and not grooves on the top of the barrel is it really a P35?
If it locks up on a cutout on the barrel and not grooves on the top of the barrel is it really a P35?
Very interesting. The cynical side of me thinks this might be a half cooked scheme to cash in on the the BHP craze that became apparent when SA introduced their clone but maybe this is something they have been cooking up for a while? It does appear to have inherited some features of the FNX and later FN pistols. I wonder what the holster compatibility will be?
Looks like a P35 cousin that fell off the ugly tree...
I briefly had a P-90 in .45 while dealing with a family member's estate. I actually regret letting that POS go. The decocker worked about 50% of the time, but it was fun to shoot. The slide cycled so slowly that you could HEAR the slide move back and forth and made an awesome "chunk" at the ends of travel. It was very soft to shoot too.
Were not most HP's built in Belgium by FN? I confess, I know nothing about BHP's so somebody clue me in here. Are they claiming the original and we will build it again just to cripple any start up clones?
Regardless, I'm not in the market.
Last edited by Borderland; 01-17-2022 at 09:00 PM.
In the P-F basket of deplorables.
Craze doesn't equal purchases. Seen it more than a few times in the firearm industry. Massive interest until the product actually comes out then suddenly crickets. It's one thing to want something, it's another to fork over the cash. Besides, you can't just throw that together in a month
Sent from my moto z4 using Tapatalk
I've remained with my late-production P89 by choice; I consider it superior to any of Ruger's subsequent duty-size offerings. And superior to most competitors, both contemporaneous and current. They could do a lot worse then re-introducing the P89/P90 in my opinion. Best, Jon