Page 23 of 32 FirstFirst ... 132122232425 ... LastLast
Results 221 to 230 of 313

Thread: New S&W CSX

  1. #221
    Member gato naranja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Location
    Always between two major rivers that begin with the letter "M."
    Quote Originally Posted by Navin Johnson View Post
    I owned 2-3 3913's and 908's in the past but forgot how slim and nice in the hand.
    My last 3913 was slowly battering itself to death, but I really liked everything else about it.

    I have no interest in an SAO smaller than an "Officer"-sized 1911, so this CSX is not something I want or need... but if they can do a similar TDA and it comes even close to the 3913, I want a pair of them.
    gn

    "On the internet, nobody knows if you are a dog... or even a cat."

  2. #222
    I got a chance to handle one today.
    It feels good in the hand. The safety is in a good place for me, but I would like it to be just a little more prominent. The trigger didn’t feel gritty, light take up, but there is a pretty stiff wall before it breaks.

  3. #223
    My guess is that the Shield series and 43x/48 have sold quite a few respectively.

    This thing is seemingly fairly new and is is getting shit on by many who likely don't have many rounds through it.

    I remember when a gun called a Glock came out and how all the "knowledgable" said no joy.

    TDA was an answer looking for a problem.

    To each their own.....

    Curious what people think the best overall major manufacturer of handguns is?

  4. #224
    Wood burnin' Curmudgeon CSW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    I can pee outside.
    Quote Originally Posted by GJM
    The CSX reminds me of the XD-E. I just went to the Springfield website and see the XD-E has been discontinued.
    Did anyone on this forum ever have any experience with the E version of the XD9?

    I'll probably be a heretic for saying this, but I have an XD9 from 2004 when they were first introduced, that runs like a charm.
    Like to hear anyone's experience with the E version.
    Sorry bout the drift...
    "... And miles to go before I sleep".

  5. #225
    Four String Fumbler Joe in PNG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Papua New Guinea; formerly Florida
    All new firearms tech is 'superfluous', 'useless', 'showy', 'a solution looking for a problem', 'unreliable compared to the old standard' and so on until it becomes popular.

    Anything other than a brace of Queen Anne's flintlocks is just roonyism.
    "You win 100% of the fights you avoid. If you're not there when it happens, you don't lose." - William Aprill
    "I've owned a guitar for 31 years and that sure hasn't made me a musician, let alone an expert. It's made me a guy who owns a guitar."- BBI

  6. #226
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    In the desert, looking for water.
    Quote Originally Posted by CSW View Post
    Did anyone on this forum ever have any experience with the E version of the XD9?

    I'll probably be a heretic for saying this, but I have an XD9 from 2004 when they were first introduced, that runs like a charm.
    Like to hear anyone's experience with the E version.
    Sorry bout the drift...
    The only experience I had with one was finger banging at a gun counter. Seemed okay, but somewhat clunky compared to the G26 and 3913s I already had, so I didn’t bother with trying to get one.

  7. #227
    I've been looking at videos on these and I'm not a buyer yet. But if they grow into a 4" barrel, all metal, hammer fired, SAO "G48'ish thing" I'd pounce all over it. An all metal slimline G19 in other words. It would absolutely rock.

  8. #228
    I have a question, if this had come out before the Shield Plus, does anyone think it would be better recieved?

  9. #229
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Cincitucky
    Quote Originally Posted by CSW View Post
    Did anyone on this forum ever have any experience with the E version of the XD9?

    I'll probably be a heretic for saying this, but I have an XD9 from 2004 when they were first introduced, that runs like a charm.
    Like to hear anyone's experience with the E version.
    Sorry bout the drift...
    You mean the XDe, right?

    I didn't like it, personally. I wanted to. Love DA/SA.

    For me, the ergos sucked. They chambered 9 and .45 in the same frame, so the grip was deep (front to back) yet extremely thin with flat sides. I found it difficult to get a solid grip, though YMMV. It also pinched my trigger finger--I think, maybe, because they wanted to offset the "deep" grip by moving the trigger break as far back as they could. It was reliable in the handful of mags I put through it. The trigger really didn't stand out, either way.

    Some people like them, though. Langdon Tactical even offered a "souped up" for a while.

  10. #230
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    ABQ
    Quote Originally Posted by CSW View Post
    Did anyone on this forum ever have any experience with the E version of the XD9?

    I'll probably be a heretic for saying this, but I have an XD9 from 2004 when they were first introduced, that runs like a charm.
    Like to hear anyone's experience with the E version.
    Sorry bout the drift...
    Once bitten, twice shy. I had a rookie that ran an XD from that era. One of the first in the state. He ignored my advice to run a case of ammunition through it before showing up to qualify. He had, near as I could tell ZERO rounds through the gun before he showed up to qual. First string of fire, click instead of bang. Tap-roll-rack and click. There was no armorer support and the gun had to go back to SA for repairs. I have cursed the Croat pistol since then. One of my co-workers was a kinda exotic gun guy; ruined his issue M4 with crap parts, and ran an XD45 without issue. I still can't warm to the gun, but apparently some work.

    pat

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •