Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 38

Thread: Shield rmsx - competition oriented sight from shield

  1. #21
    Just got an updated report on the X, distortion in the lens.
    Likes pretty much everything in every caliber.

  2. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by GJM View Post
    Just got an updated report on the X, distortion in the lens.
    Okay. Got these today and some impressions:

    Yes some fish eye distortion with movement.
    More than a DPP, similar to an SRO.
    More pronounced vertically not much laterally.

    Compared to a DPP
    Name:  1E7D4285-9B2C-4FAE-9BD8-321E3B44A362.jpg
Views: 165
Size:  33.7 KB

    Compared to an SRO
    Name:  9B5F820F-CB7D-4F96-991A-8107F1C0C907.jpg
Views: 165
Size:  32.6 KB

    It’s very light. And it’s wide. I think it would be a good open gun optic since vertical tracking would be muted with a comp.

    Refresh rate still is low. Seems lower than my older RMSc?

    Glad I got 8MOA, I think the 4 would be difficult with the low refresh rate.
    Pointing at cardboard things.... CO GM, working on PCC.

  3. #23
    Name:  12C55384-0016-4FC2-90E5-C0695A062096.jpg
Views: 156
Size:  40.5 KB

    Name:  B13721D6-33B9-4A97-BDA5-9760A4BFDC28.jpg
Views: 155
Size:  31.9 KB

    Name:  6A0DBB08-DC6E-442F-A838-FAE2337A4979.jpg
Views: 162
Size:  34.2 KB

    @GJM
    Pointing at cardboard things.... CO GM, working on PCC.

  4. #24

    Well, that didn’t last long.

    Name:  FF64C869-BB7D-484A-8D1C-89338528B968.jpg
Views: 139
Size:  40.4 KB
    Pointing at cardboard things.... CO GM, working on PCC.

  5. #25

    Fail x 2.

    Doesn’t like fast slides. This one failed in under 20 rounds.

    This is the second unit.

    Name:  9C6317D4-C051-4EE1-8D09-357858A21C82.jpg
Views: 124
Size:  29.4 KB
    Pointing at cardboard things.... CO GM, working on PCC.

  6. #26
    @HeavyDuty

    Regarding Shield, I sent both units back with prepaid shipping labels to their New York office.

    The quality manager did email me directly explaining the issue and hopefully it’s been rectified.

    Name:  FCA88DFD-B2B3-45E9-A48E-02785BB5011C.jpg
Views: 95
Size:  44.7 KB

    That being said, I’d pick Holosun over Shield now.
    Pointing at cardboard things.... CO GM, working on PCC.

  7. #27
    Ironic name for that QA fellow. (Perhaps “Notso” should have been his given name?)

  8. #28
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    The 603
    I’ll give them credit for responding quickly and positively. Crap happens.
    Ken

    BBI: ...”you better not forget the safe word because shit's about to get weird”...
    revchuck38: ...”mo' ammo is mo' betta' unless you're swimming or on fire.”

  9. #29
    Member psalms144.1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Bloomington, IN
    Quote Originally Posted by HeavyDuty View Post
    I’ll give them credit for responding quickly and positively. Crap happens.
    No shit. Had those been Glocks, you'd have been told you're using crap ammo, or don't know how to shoot. Sig would have said the removable glass was working per industry standards, but a non-removable glass "voluntary upgrade" was available.

  10. #30
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    The 603
    Quote Originally Posted by psalms144.1 View Post
    No shit. Had those been Glocks, you'd have been told you're using crap ammo, or don't know how to shoot. Sig would have said the removable glass was working per industry standards, but a non-removable glass "voluntary upgrade" was available.
    And HK would have told you to F right off.
    Ken

    BBI: ...”you better not forget the safe word because shit's about to get weird”...
    revchuck38: ...”mo' ammo is mo' betta' unless you're swimming or on fire.”

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •