Just a remainder for you all on what "9 mm NATO" means...
The original 9 mm loadings were not really hot, according to all the old ammo and firearms manuals I've read. The "hot" loadings started previous to WWII (finnish, italian, the later Canadian, perhaps someone else) in an effort to increase range of the 9 mm SMGs, but most loads in WWII were just like normal SAAMI loads of today (115 gr at 1140-1200 fps, or 124 gr at 1070-1120 fps, out of a 4" barrel). Today's better SAAMI +P loads beat/equal even the hotter loads used in WWII, with lower pressures.
The Thompson-Lagarde tests of 1904 lists a luger 9 mm, 4" barrel, 8 gram (123.5 gr) bullet at 1048 fps.
Now that most submachine guns have been replaced by assault rifles 9 mm "superloads" have largely disappeared... the NATO rounds are normally loaded just a hair hotter than normal SAAMI specs, but below SAAMI +P pressure in most cases. That is the case with most modern (made in the last 15 years or so) M882 ammo and similar euro 9 mm NATO loadings.
To complicate things, the method used to evaluate pressure in the NATO standard is different from the SAAMI, so you cannot correlate both easily. Just like with the 5.56x45 vs 223 and 7.62x51 vs 308.
NATO spec for 9 mm (STANAG 4090) allows for a VERY wide margin of power: the test barrel is 7.85", the muzzle energy must be between 400 and 600 ft·lbf, and bullet weight between 108 and 128 gr.
This means that a humble SAAMI spec 115 gr 9 mm load that has about 1140 fps in a 4" barrel, but probably does about 1260 fps in a 7.85" barrel (with 405 ft-lbs) also meets the NATO spec. at the bottom end.