Does the above offend? If you have paid to be here, you can click here to put it in context.
While I am admitted to the federal bar, my federal practice experience is limited. However, I did attend a CLE with our local federal prosecutor about 2 weeks ago, and that seems spot on to me.
A big difference - maybe THE big difference - between State prosecution, my (former) expertise area, and Federal prosecution, is that when I prosecuted for the State, depending on which county I was with, my caseload ranged from 250 to 600, probably around 300-400 on average. The fed prosecutor I had the CLE with had 12 active cases. 12. Now, I live in a slow district so the contrast is usually not that dramatic, but the main point remains that fed case loads are much lighter, allowing for greater focus on the cases they do have. The feds have many more resources and many more places to refer stuff they don't want. That means the cases they take they have all the time in the world to come up with alternate charging schemes, prep for trial exhaustively, basically all the things prosecutors dream of being able to do but can't due to the nonstop triage of case volume.
State Government Attorney | Beretta, Glock, CZ & S&W Fan
I hope you're right. And I'll reiterate my agreement that it's sad and I really hope that he can emerge from this and still have some good years left.
It makes me wonder how many people are doing the same or similar things that will never get caught. People see that happening and choose to believe they won't get caught either . . . until they do.