My old agency was an early adopter of the S&W 1006 in 10mm. We started out with 180gr fmj flat points because the guns came in but sane duty ammo didn’t and the Sheriff wanted them issued. Luckily a boutique loader soon provided us with 180gr XTP loaded to about 1200fps. They toppled road injured deer over better than our old .357 Silvertip load did and the local PDs that had gone to 9mm were jealous. We then moved on to the 175gr Silvertip and life was good for those big strapping guys on the road who could shoot. We had one actual OIS that was decisive but read like a Monty Python skit.
Some smaller/older/less burly officers struggled with requalification, and apparently the FBI with a bunch of people who were attorneys or accountants with guns had similar problems because they soon spec’d a load dialed back to 180gr@950fps and that was in their eyes “adequate”. I shot the Winchester version at a firearms instructor course at FLETC in GA, zero issues from my 1006, and I have a plaque around here somewhere that says I cleaned their qualification course every time we shot it. That load did not impress the hors d’highway deer as much as the original 180gr@1,200fps loading but we carried it for a while. Eventually 10mm ammo wasn’t being developed by the ammo companies, S&W quit making the 1006 and offered to trade us .40S&W guns and life moved on.
Much like .357Mag, 10mm ammo is all over the place depending on what factory loads it, going from being .40 S&W in a longer case to fire breathing near magnum stuff from the boutique loaders. I occasionally carry my Ruger SR1911 or GP-100 both in 10mm, and usually with the SIG V Crown because it shoots well in both guns. Personally I’d prefer a 180gr Gold Dot at 1,200fps (like my practice loads using BE-86) but Speer hasn’t seen fit to offer those. I figure I survived for 30+ years not shooting anyone with ammo worse than the V Crown, now that I’m old and retired I’ll endeavor to still not shoot anyone. In any event a 1 cm hole is going to leave a mark.
To expound on this. Yes. Jeff Cooper had been wanting a .40 caliber, 200 grain bullet, running 1000 feet per second. And he wanted a CZ75 based gun shooting it. He had a whole lot of influence in the industry in that time. The guys at Dornhouse & Dixon ended up producing some along those lines with the gun but the round was quite different. When they found an ammo manufacturer that would make the brass and rounds it was Norma. That ammo shoved a 200 grain bullet out of their test barrel at 1260 FPS and a tick over 700lb of energy, IIRC. So basically it actually was the rerun of the .41 magnum and doomed from the start.
I was pretty surprised that the FBI adopted it and was not surprised to read that they quickly downloaded it. I often wonder if the Bren 10 would have had a different outcome if Col. Cooper had been listened to a little closer. I also wonder if the .357 Sig would have happened along in the 10mm's place if it would have had a different following too since there really was no argument (at that time) that a .357 Magnum was near the perfect LE caliber (ballistically speaking) and the Sig basically replicated it. But had any of that happened we may not have ended up getting the great bullet construction methods we have today either, so there's that I guess.