Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 42

Thread: Federal .38 Special "Train and Protect" LSWC-HP

  1. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Navin Johnson View Post
    Are there not already loads that work?


    Quote Originally Posted by revchuck38 View Post
    Yes, but availability is sketchy at this time. I first saw my carry load, Remington's 158-grain LSWC-HP, for sale today after about a year of its not being out there. Winchester's version is supposed to be good too.
    Remington version didn't do well in my gel test from a couple years ago.

    https://pistol-forum.com/showthread....highlight=test

    Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

  2. #12
    Gray Hobbyist Wondering Beard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    The Coterie Club
    Quote Originally Posted by Tokarev View Post
    Remington version didn't do well in my gel test from a couple years ago.

    https://pistol-forum.com/showthread....highlight=test

    Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
    As far as I remember, none of the "big threes" 158gr +P LSWCHP did well in ballistic gelatin tests but they still did quite well on bad guys.
    " La rose est sans pourquoi, elle fleurit parce qu’elle fleurit ; Elle n’a souci d’elle-même, ne demande pas si on la voit. » Angelus Silesius
    "There are problems in this universe for which there are no answers." Paul Muad'dib

  3. #13
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    South Louisiana
    Quote Originally Posted by Tokarev View Post
    Remington version didn't do well in my gel test from a couple years ago.

    https://pistol-forum.com/showthread....highlight=test

    Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
    Quote Originally Posted by Wondering Beard View Post
    As far as I remember, none of the "big threes" 158gr +P LSWCHP did well in ballistic gelatin tests but they still did quite well on bad guys.
    The 158-grain +P LSWC-HP loads were designed to work well from the 4" barrels in common use in the '80s. I'm not surprised they didn't expand from a 2", though penetration was still good.

    FWIW, the velocity of the Remington load from my 3" M10-7 was ~835 fps and ~865 fps from my 4" M10-8. My notebook is in my range bag which is in my truck or I'd be more precise. I run Winchester's 130-grain Ranger Bonded +P in my 642 because it needs lighter bullets to hit POA and because it's Doc-recommended. The 642 has its own dedicated ammo can of 125-grain handloads for practice.

  4. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by revchuck38 View Post
    Do you know this, or is it your inner snark monster talking?
    Inner? Sir my snark monster is very external.

    And I do actually know it, the load specs are exactly the same as previous packaging according to the sell sheets.

  5. #15
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    South Louisiana
    Quote Originally Posted by jetfire View Post
    ...the load specs are exactly the same as previous packaging according to the sell sheets.
    Uh, nope. Here is the current stuff. Here is the stuff it replaced. The new stuff is brass cased and standard pressure, the old stuff is nickel cased and +P. The bullets do look fairly similar; the darker color on the new stuff could well have been caused by more time in the tumbling media. I'm unaware of anyway non-+P 158-grain LSWC-HP offered by Federal prior to this.

    It's also quite possible that Federal just subbed brass cases for nickel and backed off on the powder charge enough to bring it to standard pressure specs. They claim it's a new bullet design. We won't know until a reputable source actually tests this load, and it's a good chance that'll never happen. I'm going to test it for velocity and accuracy, but then I'm a disreputable source. Worst case, I've really overpaid for two boxes of practice ammo.

  6. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by revchuck38 View Post
    Uh, nope. Here is the current stuff. Here is the stuff it replaced. The new stuff is brass cased and standard pressure, the old stuff is nickel cased and +P. The bullets do look fairly similar; the darker color on the new stuff could well have been caused by more time in the tumbling media. I'm unaware of anyway non-+P 158-grain LSWC-HP offered by Federal prior to this.

    It's also quite possible that Federal just subbed brass cases for nickel and backed off on the powder charge enough to bring it to standard pressure specs. They claim it's a new bullet design. We won't know until a reputable source actually tests this load, and it's a good chance that'll never happen. I'm going to test it for velocity and accuracy, but then I'm a disreputable source. Worst case, I've really overpaid for two boxes of practice ammo.
    I wasn't aware they had different claimed MVs on the new load vs the old one, that's interesting. Regardless, my dude at Federal says that the projectile is the same as the old one. I stand corrected on the velocity, although I'd be willing to bet that the new stuff chronos hotter than 830 FPS.

  7. #17
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    South Louisiana
    Quote Originally Posted by jetfire View Post
    I wasn't aware they had different claimed MVs on the new load vs the old one, that's interesting. Regardless, my dude at Federal says that the projectile is the same as the old one. I stand corrected on the velocity, although I'd be willing to bet that the new stuff chronos hotter than 830 FPS.
    If it's the same bullet, then it'll be dedicated to my M49 which shoots to POA with 158s. Nothing that weight is going to expand anyway. I'll chrono it when it gets here, it'll be interesting to see what we end up with.

  8. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by revchuck38 View Post
    If it's the same bullet, then it'll be dedicated to my M49 which shoots to POA with 158s. Nothing that weight is going to expand anyway. I'll chrono it when it gets here, it'll be interesting to see what we end up with.
    Definitely. I can say that I shot some the new one and the old allegedly +P load out of that Python I beat up and the felt recoil impulse was so similar that I couldn't have told you one from the other.

  9. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by revchuck38 View Post
    Yes, but availability is sketchy at this time. I first saw my carry load, Remington's 158-grain LSWC-HP, for sale today after about a year of its not being out there. Winchester's version is supposed to be good too. If Federal's new iteration of this load works well it'd give us another option. Plus it's about half the price - $.80/round versus $1.50/round for the Remington. I might order a couple of boxes just to play with it.

    ETA: I ordered two boxes off Federal's website. I'll check for velocity and POI/POA when it gets here.

    What are your thoughts on a 170 grain powder coated LSWC-HP loaded warm?

    I know an older gentleman who casts and PCs amazing bullets. I was considering paying him to cast me up a big batch if there was enough of a market for such things. I set back a bit of Starline brass for such a project, but I just haven't decided on a direction.

    A +P defense type .38 might be the way to go, if the demand is there.






    They are what I currently keep loaded in my Model 15 that is kept as one of the house guns.

  10. #20
    Site Supporter Hambo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Behind the Photonic Curtain
    Quote Originally Posted by Lost River View Post
    What are your thoughts on a 170 grain powder coated LSWC-HP loaded warm?


    They are what I currently keep loaded in my Model 15 that is kept as one of the house guns.
    Have you tried any of those in magnum cases?
    "Gunfighting is a thinking man's game. So we might want to bring thinking back into it."-MDFA

    Beware of my temper, and the dog that I've found...

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •