Page 84 of 86 FirstFirst ... 34748283848586 LastLast
Results 831 to 840 of 857

Thread: Aimpoint ACRO P-2

  1. #831
    Site Supporter Sensei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Greece/NC
    Quote Originally Posted by GJM View Post
    I was shooting a match with a friend on Sunday, that tried hard to compete with his CBP issued Acro and Glock. Despite being an extremely talented shooter, he really disliked the Acro for competition. The thought was Aimpoint should have included a caution in the manual that says the Acro was not designed to be used with a timer.
    The combination of thick walls and small window is going to annoy people who spend a lot of time behind SROs and even RMRs. It is really hard to be target focused when there is a thick framed, narrow aperture overlaying the area around the target…that is 2.5 feet from your eye.

    I liken the ACRO’s sight picture to the mafia of the red dot world - you can try to look out but it pulls you back in…

    Name:  IMG_1120.jpg
Views: 680
Size:  34.4 KB
    I like my rifles like my women - short, light, fast, brown, and suppressed.

  2. #832

    That is what put me on the journey with dots...

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Williams View Post
    I agree I can't stand the small window, BUT my buddy shot 120+ on a Rogers test with one, so good shooting can be done.
    I got serious about starting to learn a dot on a handgun just over 5 years ago. I had a P1 on a carry 19, and the late Ronnie Dodd(RIP, sir) offered me a day on his Rogers setup. I had been to Rogers, managed (barely) an Advanced rating with irons, and wanted to see how a dot would fare.
    Long story short, got hooked(dotted?). I still qual with irons also, but it was so much easier with the dot.
    I can see the improvement of a big window for wooden open competition. My EPS is less "cluttered" visually for example

  3. #833
    I'm still new to dots other than using them on other people's guns. I find the acro to be the easiest dot I've used besides a T-1 to pick up. My guess is it's easier to pick up a tube than a dot just floating there on a screen.

  4. #834
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    TEXAS !
    Quote Originally Posted by Trajan View Post
    I'm still new to dots other than using them on other people's guns. I find the acro to be the easiest dot I've used besides a T-1 to pick up. My guess is it's easier to pick up a tube than a dot just floating there on a screen.
    Yes, but no.

    Your perception is accurate in that for an iron site shooter transitioning to red dots who is still developing their index and target focus, what I describe as the “scope shadow” effect helps with finding the dot.

    However, once one develops their index and their hard target focus such that they are focusing hard on a specific spot on the target on the dot “appears” via index / proprioception, the tendency of the thicker tube /body to draw focus from the target to the dot/optic is noticeable vs “floater” optics with bigger windows and/or thinner optic bodies. It’s not insurmountable, but there is a noticeable difference.

  5. #835
    Site Supporter Erick Gelhaus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    The Wasatch Front
    And there is this:

    Name:  442408964_459046343320961_5419122042305731216_n.jpg
Views: 595
Size:  32.8 KB

    The OP referenced Kyle Lamb and said it was important to be able to QD your optic if something like this happens. FML. No.

    If you carry in an open holster (like uniformed carry), an enclosed emitter design has significant benefits.

    Regardless of your choice, if something like this happens, treat it like a blocked optic. Use the housing shape, the slide plate cover/hammer, or the frame/slide interface for sighting and solve your problem.

    A few years back at Gunsite, had a carbine student who insisted this wouldn't happen. It didn't until he went prone at 200. When he was done with the carbine on that drill & stood up, I had him (try to) take a sight picture. He understood my point. Doesn't happen every time.

  6. #836
    Likes pretty much everything in every caliber.

  7. #837
    He posted a full 'tube video but I'm not here to do @Tokarev 's work...
    Doesn't read posts longer than two paragraphs.

  8. #838
    Ben talks about the ACRO



    Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
    Official re-poster of Stoeger videos

  9. #839
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    SC
    That back and forth between Tokarev and YVK made my day.

    Also, I own an Acro P2 and honestly I give a lot of credibility to Ben’s views. He’s always reported data accurately so this is a bit concerning.

    It is what it is - we’ll see how it goes. I like Aimpoint and when I bought it I believe it was the only enclosed emitter and Aimpoint does have a solid reputation. Now reputations are generally accurate, but each product can have its own nuances and I think the P1 was a miss with regards to the battery compartment but the P2 seemed to fix that.

    Has anyone here observed a broken P2? Fogging, cracks, etc.?

    My wife literally dropped mine on the pavement the other night from shoulder height and it has no issues other than finish wear. She grabbed the holster to move it and it came out of the holster in the night time (beach vacation we changed into bathing suits and went to the beach) and landed on the optic. I honestly think that would’ve broken or cracked my SRO.

    No issues with the ACRO.
    God Bless,

    Brandon

  10. #840
    I have one. It was put together incorrectly at the factory and was malfunctioning. Wayne helped, they took it in, reassembled correctly, and so far prob-free. Sample of 1, low round count etc.
    Doesn't read posts longer than two paragraphs.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •