Page 143 of 185 FirstFirst ... 4393133141142143144145153 ... LastLast
Results 1,421 to 1,430 of 1845

Thread: COVID-19 vaccines: medical concerns and recommendations

  1. #1421
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Quote Originally Posted by WobblyPossum View Post
    It’s my understanding that the rapid tests are much less accurate than the PCR tests.
    That's my understanding as well. I view it as "negative, you might not have covid, positive, you DO have covid".

    Chris

  2. #1422
    Quote Originally Posted by LittleLebowski View Post
    POSITIVE this morning. I feel fine. I was told that there’s a shortage of monoclonals in my state and they’re prioritizing those for unhealthy people with comorbidities and that’s not me, apparently.

    I’m on the I-Mask+ protocol as much as I can, plus famtodine. I feel pretty good, like I’ve got a cold, but nothing bad. I want to go cut and split firewood later.
    I’m still fine, it still feels like a cold. I cut and split firewood for hours yesterday. The kids have it now, despite me quarantining, so FUCK IT.
    #RESIST

  3. #1423
    Site Supporter HeavyDuty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Not very bright but does lack ambition
    Quote Originally Posted by LittleLebowski View Post
    I’m still fine, it still feels like a cold. I cut and split firewood for hours yesterday. The kids have it now, despite me quarantining, so FUCK IT.
    This is the one we are all likely to get. I’ve been hearing of Covid parties where people are purposely exposing themselves to get it over with. I can see the appeal.
    Ken

    BBI: ...”you better not forget the safe word because shit's about to get weird”...
    revchuck38: ...”mo' ammo is mo' betta' unless you're swimming or on fire.”

  4. #1424
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    West TN
    Quote Originally Posted by David S. View Post
    I'm getting the very unscientific impressions that there's a lot of false negatives with Omicron.
    My friend and two of the people he was with both tested negative on rapid tests when they had initial symptoms. The follow up rapid tests once they had significantly stronger symptoms tested positive. I am not sure if it is a sensitivity issue with the test to omicron or just the rapid tests in general.

    My area is getting hammered right now with it. I know of one person that has died from it (unvaxed with health issues). I have two vaxed friends who have mild cases. Hopefully it will burn out here soon. The manufacturing facilities that my wife and i both work at are having major slowdowns due to people being out sick on top of all the material shortages. My facility is 40% vaxed but that doesn't really seem to be helping. Everyone I know that has it right now is vaxed.

    What a time to be alive.

  5. #1425
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    E. Wash.
    Here is a good article on rapid tests and Omicron from the WSJ.

    Preliminary data from a real-world study comparing more than 700 people’s PCR and rapid test results from the BinaxNow test in January at a San Francisco community site found that the rapid tests performed on par with Omicron as with previous variants, detecting over 95% of people with high viral loads. The study, which was published as a preprint and hasn’t been peer-reviewed, found that as with previous variants the rapid tests weren’t as sensitive in picking up infections when viral load was lower, missing about 35% of people who had a positive PCR with any level of virus.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-rel...series_omicron

    (By the way, the WSJ is still a pretty good newspaper).

    Edited to add: There is other pertinent info in the article itself -- the part I cut and pasted was not the entire summary -- it is worth a read.

  6. #1426
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Reno NV area
    Quote Originally Posted by idahojess View Post
    Here is a good article on rapid tests and Omicron from the WSJ.

    Preliminary data from a real-world study comparing more than 700 people’s PCR and rapid test results from the BinaxNow test in January at a San Francisco community site found that the rapid tests performed on par with Omicron as with previous variants, detecting over 95% of people with high viral loads. The study, which was published as a preprint and hasn’t been peer-reviewed, found that as with previous variants the rapid tests weren’t as sensitive in picking up infections when viral load was lower, missing about 35% of people who had a positive PCR with any level of virus.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-rel...series_omicron

    (By the way, the WSJ is still a pretty good newspaper).

    Edited to add: There is other pertinent info in the article itself -- the part I cut and pasted was not the entire summary -- it is worth a read.
    I vaguely remember (could have learned from some post here, not sure) that the Binax test is still pretty good, but other tests that look for a different protein are basically useless against Omicron.

  7. #1427
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    New Mexico
    Israel seems to have data showing 4th shot isn’t effective at stopping Omicron.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/middle...on-2022-01-17/

  8. #1428
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    the Deep South
    Quote Originally Posted by luckyman View Post
    I vaguely remember (could have learned from some post here, not sure) that the Binax test is still pretty good, but other tests that look for a different protein are basically useless against Omicron.
    I might have posted that. Binax looks for nucleocapsid protein. The Omicron spike protein has dozens of mutations, which means that antibodies against he parental virus spike protein won't recognize it as well. This impacts sensitivity of some tests and, of course, vaccine efficacy. If I had any tests looking for presence of the parental virus's spike protein, I'd throw them out as they are essentially useless now that Omicron has taken over.

  9. #1429
    Site Supporter Totem Polar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    PacNW
    Quote Originally Posted by Jakus View Post
    Israel seems to have data showing 4th shot isn’t effective at stopping Omicron.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/middle...on-2022-01-17/
    LoL. You can’t cure the (un)common cold.

    So long as almost nobody who wasn’t already critically ill is getting severely ill, operation warp speed remains a resounding success.

    JMO.


    (I can’t believe that I actually used “LoL” in a comment about omicron getting past boosters, but that is what it is too. I’m with Bari on this… https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR...EegQIAhAF&ep=6 )
    ”But in the end all of these ideas just manufacture new criminals when the problem isn't a lack of criminals.” -JRB

  10. #1430
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    NH
    Quote Originally Posted by pangloss View Post
    If I had any tests looking for presence of the parental virus's spike protein, I'd throw them out as they are essentially useless now that Omicron has taken over.
    Do the various home tests specify what protein they test for?

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •